On Apr 29, 2015 1:11 AM, "Richard Purdie" <
richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2015-04-28 at 22:34 -0700, Khem Raj wrote:
> > we still need nativesdk or native recipes for libc to come
> > from glibc, but only be ignored for target recipes types
> >
> > Change-Id: Ibaf8114f2aef
On Tue, 2015-04-28 at 22:34 -0700, Khem Raj wrote:
> we still need nativesdk or native recipes for libc to come
> from glibc, but only be ignored for target recipes types
>
> Change-Id: Ibaf8114f2aef63f1eadf493b264e78cd928535a0
> Signed-off-by: Khem Raj
> ---
> meta/recipes-core/glibc/glibc-col
we still need nativesdk or native recipes for libc to come
from glibc, but only be ignored for target recipes types
Change-Id: Ibaf8114f2aef63f1eadf493b264e78cd928535a0
Signed-off-by: Khem Raj
---
meta/recipes-core/glibc/glibc-collateral.inc | 3 +++
meta/recipes-core/glibc/glibc_2.21.bb