Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 2/6] gmp: Bring back version 4.2.1 (LGPL 2.1+)

2015-09-01 Thread Khem Raj
> On Sep 1, 2015, at 7:55 AM, Mark Hatle wrote: > > > Do you have any sense of the problems when gcc uses an older version of GMP? > If > a newer version is required for gcc -- then can gcc itself check that it's a > proper minimum version available? (At this point I would assume if someone

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 2/6] gmp: Bring back version 4.2.1 (LGPL 2.1+)

2015-09-01 Thread Mark Hatle
On 8/31/15 10:27 AM, Khem Raj wrote: > >> On Aug 31, 2015, at 8:21 AM, Martin Jansa wrote: >> >> On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 10:22:31AM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote: >>> On Sat, Aug 29, 2015 at 7:18 AM, Richard Purdie >>> wrote: On Sat, 2015-08-29 at 10:43 +0200, Martin Jansa wrote: > Did y

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 2/6] gmp: Bring back version 4.2.1 (LGPL 2.1+)

2015-09-01 Thread Khem Raj
On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 4:21 AM, Jussi Kukkonen wrote: > On 31 August 2015 at 17:38, Khem Raj wrote: >> There is alternative suggestion. I think all this is happening for >> nettle which we have GPLv2 version in core. There doesnt seem to be a >> full use of libgmp elsewhere. >> nettle can be buil

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 2/6] gmp: Bring back version 4.2.1 (LGPL 2.1+)

2015-09-01 Thread Jussi Kukkonen
On 31 August 2015 at 17:38, Khem Raj wrote: > There is alternative suggestion. I think all this is happening for > nettle which we have GPLv2 version in core. There doesnt seem to be a > full use of libgmp elsewhere. > nettle can be built using mini-gmp, as well I think that route should > be expl

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 2/6] gmp: Bring back version 4.2.1 (LGPL 2.1+)

2015-08-31 Thread Khem Raj
> On Aug 31, 2015, at 8:21 AM, Martin Jansa wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 10:22:31AM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote: >> On Sat, Aug 29, 2015 at 7:18 AM, Richard Purdie >> wrote: >>> On Sat, 2015-08-29 at 10:43 +0200, Martin Jansa wrote: Did you enable thumb in that qemuarm build?

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 2/6] gmp: Bring back version 4.2.1 (LGPL 2.1+)

2015-08-31 Thread Martin Jansa
On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 10:22:31AM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote: > On Sat, Aug 29, 2015 at 7:18 AM, Richard Purdie > wrote: > > On Sat, 2015-08-29 at 10:43 +0200, Martin Jansa wrote: > >> Did you enable thumb in that qemuarm build? > >> > >> > >> It's disabled by default and multiple components ar

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 2/6] gmp: Bring back version 4.2.1 (LGPL 2.1+)

2015-08-31 Thread Alexander Kanavin
On 08/31/2015 05:01 PM, Otavio Salvador wrote: By your comment, I should just refuse the old gmp version entirely? Until proper fixed, yes. I disagree with this. If gmp isn't working on a specific hardware platform, but is just fine on the others, that is not sufficient grounds for altoget

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 2/6] gmp: Bring back version 4.2.1 (LGPL 2.1+)

2015-08-31 Thread Otavio Salvador
On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 10:53 AM, Richard Purdie wrote: > On Mon, 2015-08-31 at 10:22 -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote: >> On Sat, Aug 29, 2015 at 7:18 AM, Richard Purdie >> wrote: >> > On Sat, 2015-08-29 at 10:43 +0200, Martin Jansa wrote: >> >> Did you enable thumb in that qemuarm build? >> >> >> >

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 2/6] gmp: Bring back version 4.2.1 (LGPL 2.1+)

2015-08-31 Thread Richard Purdie
On Mon, 2015-08-31 at 10:22 -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote: > On Sat, Aug 29, 2015 at 7:18 AM, Richard Purdie > wrote: > > On Sat, 2015-08-29 at 10:43 +0200, Martin Jansa wrote: > >> Did you enable thumb in that qemuarm build? > >> > >> > >> It's disabled by default and multiple components are broke

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 2/6] gmp: Bring back version 4.2.1 (LGPL 2.1+)

2015-08-31 Thread Otavio Salvador
On Sat, Aug 29, 2015 at 7:18 AM, Richard Purdie wrote: > On Sat, 2015-08-29 at 10:43 +0200, Martin Jansa wrote: >> Did you enable thumb in that qemuarm build? >> >> >> It's disabled by default and multiple components are broken when you >> enable it, see: >> https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 2/6] gmp: Bring back version 4.2.1 (LGPL 2.1+)

2015-08-29 Thread Richard Purdie
On Sat, 2015-08-29 at 10:43 +0200, Martin Jansa wrote: > Did you enable thumb in that qemuarm build? > > > It's disabled by default and multiple components are broken when you > enable it, see: > https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7717 I'm going to draw a line here. People are ask

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 2/6] gmp: Bring back version 4.2.1 (LGPL 2.1+)

2015-08-29 Thread Martin Jansa
Did you enable thumb in that qemuarm build? It's disabled by default and multiple components are broken when you enable it, see: https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7717 On Sat, Aug 29, 2015 at 8:17 AM, Jussi Kukkonen wrote: > On 28 August 2015 at 10:44, Jussi Kukkonen > wrote: >

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 2/6] gmp: Bring back version 4.2.1 (LGPL 2.1+)

2015-08-28 Thread Jussi Kukkonen
On 28 August 2015 at 10:44, Jussi Kukkonen wrote: > On 28 August 2015 at 09:03, Khem Raj wrote: > > > On Aug 27, 2015, at 6:05 AM, Jussi Kukkonen wrote: > > > > > > gmp 4.2.1 was removed in f181c6ce8b apparently accidentally: It > > > was not noticed that 4.2.1 is LGPL 2.1 (and not GPL) so provi

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 2/6] gmp: Bring back version 4.2.1 (LGPL 2.1+)

2015-08-28 Thread Jussi Kukkonen
On 28 August 2015 at 09:03, Khem Raj wrote: > > > > On Aug 27, 2015, at 6:05 AM, Jussi Kukkonen wrote: > > > > gmp 4.2.1 was removed in f181c6ce8b apparently accidentally: It > > was not noticed that 4.2.1 is LGPL 2.1 (and not GPL) so provides > > a useful alternative to the newer "GPLv2 | LGPLv3

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 2/6] gmp: Bring back version 4.2.1 (LGPL 2.1+)

2015-08-27 Thread Khem Raj
> On Aug 27, 2015, at 6:05 AM, Jussi Kukkonen wrote: > > gmp 4.2.1 was removed in f181c6ce8b apparently accidentally: It > was not noticed that 4.2.1 is LGPL 2.1 (and not GPL) so provides > a useful alternative to the newer "GPLv2 | LGPLv3" version. > > * Reintroduce 4.2.1. The source includes

[OE-core] [PATCH 2/6] gmp: Bring back version 4.2.1 (LGPL 2.1+)

2015-08-27 Thread Jussi Kukkonen
gmp 4.2.1 was removed in f181c6ce8b apparently accidentally: It was not noticed that 4.2.1 is LGPL 2.1 (and not GPL) so provides a useful alternative to the newer "GPLv2 | LGPLv3" version. * Reintroduce 4.2.1. The source includes files that are GPL but the library package is LGPL 2.1+ * Also rei