Le Sun, 24 Mar 2013 11:55:09 -0500,
John Weber a écrit :
> Showing my ignorance here, but is a manifest created with all of the packaged
> licenses? Is it possible for the developer to ship that if they see fit?
>
> I think what Otavio was trying to do was to keep /lib/firmware from being
> c
Showing my ignorance here, but is a manifest created with all of the packaged
licenses? Is it possible for the developer to ship that if they see fit?
I think what Otavio was trying to do was to keep /lib/firmware from being
cluttered with license files. At least, that is the benefit as I see
On Sun, Mar 24, 2013 at 12:01 PM, Eric Bénard wrote:
> Hi Otavio,
>
> Le Sat, 23 Mar 2013 17:30:58 -0300,
> Otavio Salvador a écrit :
>> We don't ship license files with packages and firmware packages are no
>> different; drop them.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Otavio Salvador
>
> there may be a good re
Hi Otavio,
Le Sat, 23 Mar 2013 17:30:58 -0300,
Otavio Salvador a écrit :
> We don't ship license files with packages and firmware packages are no
> different; drop them.
>
> Signed-off-by: Otavio Salvador
there may be a good reason to distribute the license files together with
the firmware's b
On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 6:23 PM, Khem Raj wrote:
> Should they be packaged elsewhere
It may come in the package license but this not at my control and I
think it is being done already. Not in binaries for rootfs.
--
Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems
E-mail: ota...@ossystem
Should they be packaged elsewhere
On Saturday, March 23, 2013, Otavio Salvador
wrote:
> We don't ship license files with packages and firmware packages are no
> different; drop them.
>
> Signed-off-by: Otavio Salvador
> ---
> meta/recipes-kernel/linux-firmware/linux-firmware_git.bb | 9
We don't ship license files with packages and firmware packages are no
different; drop them.
Signed-off-by: Otavio Salvador
---
meta/recipes-kernel/linux-firmware/linux-firmware_git.bb | 9 -
1 file changed, 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/meta/recipes-kernel/linux-firmware/linux-firmware_g