On 01/07/2016 06:57 PM, Richard Purdie wrote:
On Wed, 2016-01-06 at 23:45 -0800, Robert Yang wrote:
The dependencies chain:
run-postinsts -> update-rc.d.bbclass -> initscripts -> update
-alternatives.
The update-alternatives is provided by opkg-utils which is not
allarch.
This caused a probl
On 01/07/2016 06:57 PM, Richard Purdie wrote:
On Wed, 2016-01-06 at 23:45 -0800, Robert Yang wrote:
The dependencies chain:
run-postinsts -> update-rc.d.bbclass -> initscripts -> update
-alternatives.
The update-alternatives is provided by opkg-utils which is not
allarch.
This caused a probl
On 01/07/2016 06:57 PM, Richard Purdie wrote:
On Wed, 2016-01-06 at 23:45 -0800, Robert Yang wrote:
The dependencies chain:
run-postinsts -> update-rc.d.bbclass -> initscripts -> update
-alternatives.
The update-alternatives is provided by opkg-utils which is not
allarch.
This caused a probl
On Wed, 2016-01-06 at 23:45 -0800, Robert Yang wrote:
> The dependencies chain:
> run-postinsts -> update-rc.d.bbclass -> initscripts -> update
> -alternatives.
>
> The update-alternatives is provided by opkg-utils which is not
> allarch.
>
> This caused a problem:
> $ bitbake lib32-core-image-mi
The dependencies chain:
run-postinsts -> update-rc.d.bbclass -> initscripts -> update-alternatives.
The update-alternatives is provided by opkg-utils which is not allarch.
This caused a problem:
$ bitbake lib32-core-image-minimal
Both lib32-opkg-utils and opkg-utils would be built, but opkg-util
