> -Original Message-
> From: Khem Raj [mailto:raj.k...@gmail.com]
> Sent: den 1 december 2016 17:50
> To: Peter Kjellerstedt
> Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
> Subject: Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 2/2 V5] systemd: Upgrade to 232
>
> On Thu, Dec 1
sent a v4
On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 12:22 PM, Burton, Ross wrote:
>
> On 28 November 2016 at 21:26, Khem Raj wrote:
>>
>> -PV = "230+git${SRCPV}"
>
>
> packages/corei7-64-intel-common-poky-linux/systemd-boot/systemd-boot-dev:
> PKGV changed from 230+git0+3a74d4fc90 to 1.0 [default]
>
> I'm starting
On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 12:22 PM, Burton, Ross wrote:
>
> On 28 November 2016 at 21:26, Khem Raj wrote:
>>
>> -PV = "230+git${SRCPV}"
>
>
> packages/corei7-64-intel-common-poky-linux/systemd-boot/systemd-boot-dev:
> PKGV changed from 230+git0+3a74d4fc90 to 1.0 [default]
>
> I'm starting to wonder
On 28 November 2016 at 21:26, Khem Raj wrote:
> -PV = "230+git${SRCPV}"
>
packages/corei7-64-intel-common-poky-linux/systemd-boot/systemd-boot-dev:
PKGV changed from 230+git0+3a74d4fc90 to 1.0 [default]
I'm starting to wonder if systemd and systemd-boot sharing a .inc is a good
idea!
Ross
--
22:26
>> To: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
>> Subject: [OE-core] [PATCH 2/2 V5] systemd: Upgrade to 232
>>
>> * Drop support for rcS.d SysV init scripts.
>> These are prone to cause dependency loops, and almost all packages
>> with
>> rcS scripts
> -Original Message-
> From: openembedded-core-boun...@lists.openembedded.org
> [mailto:openembedded-core-boun...@lists.openembedded.org] On Behalf Of
> Khem Raj
> Sent: den 28 november 2016 22:26
> To: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
> Subject: [OE-core] [
* Drop support for rcS.d SysV init scripts.
These are prone to cause dependency loops, and almost all packages with
rcS scripts now ship a native systemd service.
* Drop mount propagation patch, it only happens with libseccomp, OE doesnt
enable it
* kdbus option has disappeared from configu
