Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 2/2] rootfs_rpm.bbclass: save rpmlib rather than remove it

On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 6:20 PM, Robert Yang wrote: > > > On 05/14/2012 05:44 PM, Koen Kooi wrote: >> >> Op 14 mei 2012, om 10:11 heeft Robert Yang het volgende geschreven: >> >>> The rpmlib was removed when core-image-minimal, >> >> >> Please replace 'core-image-minimal' with something like: >> >

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 2/2] rootfs_rpm.bbclass: save rpmlib rather than remove it

On 05/14/2012 05:44 PM, Koen Kooi wrote: Op 14 mei 2012, om 10:11 heeft Robert Yang het volgende geschreven: The rpmlib was removed when core-image-minimal, Please replace 'core-image-minimal' with something like: images that add "remove_packaging_data_files ; " to ROOTFS_POSTPRO

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 2/2] rootfs_rpm.bbclass: save rpmlib rather than remove it

Op 14 mei 2012, om 10:11 heeft Robert Yang het volgende geschreven: > The rpmlib was removed when core-image-minimal, Please replace 'core-image-minimal' with something like: images that add "remove_packaging_data_files ; " to ROOTFS_POSTPROCESS_COMMAND That points out the actual prob

[OE-core] [PATCH 2/2] rootfs_rpm.bbclass: save rpmlib rather than remove it

The rpmlib was removed when core-image-minimal, which would make the increment rpm image generation doesn't work in the second build, since list_installed_packages would get incorrect value in the second build, move the rpmlib to ${T} rather than remove it, and move it back when INC_RPM_IMAGE_GEN =