On 03/11/2013 04:54 PM, Saul Wold wrote:
> On 03/07/2013 04:39 PM, tom.zanu...@linux.intel.com wrote:
>> From: Tom Zanussi
>>
>> There's nothing kernel-version-specific about the perf_3.4 recipe, so
>> it's actually misnamed and misleading now that it also gets used with
>> the 3.8 kernel.
>>
>> S
On Mon, 2013-03-11 at 16:54 -0700, Saul Wold wrote:
> On 03/07/2013 04:39 PM, tom.zanu...@linux.intel.com wrote:
> > From: Tom Zanussi
> >
> > There's nothing kernel-version-specific about the perf_3.4 recipe, so
> > it's actually misnamed and misleading now that it also gets used with
> > the 3.8
On 03/07/2013 04:39 PM, tom.zanu...@linux.intel.com wrote:
From: Tom Zanussi
There's nothing kernel-version-specific about the perf_3.4 recipe, so
it's actually misnamed and misleading now that it also gets used with
the 3.8 kernel.
Since the recipe isn't tied to a specific PV, and simply uses
From: Tom Zanussi
There's nothing kernel-version-specific about the perf_3.4 recipe, so
it's actually misnamed and misleading now that it also gets used with
the 3.8 kernel.
Since the recipe isn't tied to a specific PV, and simply uses
whatever's in STAGING_KERNEL_DIR, there's no reason to add a
