Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 2/2] distcc_2.18.3.bb: Fix compilation on uclibc

2011-05-21 Thread Khem Raj
On Sat, May 21, 2011 at 12:17 PM, Koen Kooi wrote: > > Op 21 mei 2011, om 09:19 heeft Khem Raj het volgende geschreven: > >> >> >> -Khem >> >> On May 20, 2011, at 11:34 PM, Phil Blundell wrote: >> >>> On Fri, 2011-05-20 at 16:19 -0700, Khem Raj wrote: -DEPENDS = "avahi gtk+" +DEPENDS =

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 2/2] distcc_2.18.3.bb: Fix compilation on uclibc

2011-05-21 Thread Koen Kooi
Op 21 mei 2011, om 09:19 heeft Khem Raj het volgende geschreven: > > > -Khem > > On May 20, 2011, at 11:34 PM, Phil Blundell wrote: > >> On Fri, 2011-05-20 at 16:19 -0700, Khem Raj wrote: >>> -DEPENDS = "avahi gtk+" >>> +DEPENDS = "avahi ${GTKDEP}" >>> +GTKDEP-libc-uclibc = "" >>> +GTKDEP =

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 2/2] distcc_2.18.3.bb: Fix compilation on uclibc

2011-05-21 Thread Phil Blundell
On Sat, 2011-05-21 at 00:19 -0700, Khem Raj wrote: > >> -EXTRA_OECONF = " --with-gtk " > >> - > >> +EXTRA_OECONF_libc-glibc = " --with-gtk " > >> +EXTRA_OECONF_libc-uclibc = " --without-gtk --without-gnome " > > > > Can you make this use the same logic as above? > > > > Is there a problem with t

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 2/2] distcc_2.18.3.bb: Fix compilation on uclibc

2011-05-21 Thread Khem Raj
-Khem On May 20, 2011, at 11:34 PM, Phil Blundell wrote: > On Fri, 2011-05-20 at 16:19 -0700, Khem Raj wrote: >> -DEPENDS = "avahi gtk+" >> +DEPENDS = "avahi ${GTKDEP}" >> +GTKDEP-libc-uclibc = "" >> +GTKDEP = "gtk+" > > Does that really work? Surely it should be "GTKDEP_libc-uclibc". > No

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 2/2] distcc_2.18.3.bb: Fix compilation on uclibc

2011-05-20 Thread Phil Blundell
On Fri, 2011-05-20 at 16:19 -0700, Khem Raj wrote: > -DEPENDS = "avahi gtk+" > +DEPENDS = "avahi ${GTKDEP}" > +GTKDEP-libc-uclibc = "" > +GTKDEP = "gtk+" Does that really work? Surely it should be "GTKDEP_libc-uclibc". > -EXTRA_OECONF = " --with-gtk " > - > +EXTRA_OECONF_libc-glibc = " --with-gt

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 2/2] distcc_2.18.3.bb: Fix compilation on uclibc

2011-05-20 Thread Koen Kooi
Op 21 mei 2011, om 01:19 heeft Khem Raj het volgende geschreven: > > do_install_append() { > install -d ${D}${sysconfdir}/init.d/ > install -d ${D}${sysconfdir}/default > install -m 0755 ${WORKDIR}/distcc ${D}${sysconfdir}/init.d/ > install -m 0755 ${WORKDIR}/default ${D}${sysconf

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 2/2] distcc_2.18.3.bb: Fix compilation on uclibc

2011-05-20 Thread Khem Raj
On (21/05/11 00:31), Richard Purdie wrote: > On Fri, 2011-05-20 at 16:19 -0700, Khem Raj wrote: > > We enable gtk/gnome in distcc that code uses loadavg() > > a function unimplemented in uclibc. Therefore for uclibc > > we disable gnome and gtk+ features in distcc > > > > Signed-off-by: Khem Raj

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 2/2] distcc_2.18.3.bb: Fix compilation on uclibc

2011-05-20 Thread Khem Raj
On (21/05/11 00:31), Richard Purdie wrote: > On Fri, 2011-05-20 at 16:19 -0700, Khem Raj wrote: > > We enable gtk/gnome in distcc that code uses loadavg() > > a function unimplemented in uclibc. Therefore for uclibc > > we disable gnome and gtk+ features in distcc > > > > Signed-off-by: Khem Raj

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 2/2] distcc_2.18.3.bb: Fix compilation on uclibc

2011-05-20 Thread Richard Purdie
On Fri, 2011-05-20 at 16:19 -0700, Khem Raj wrote: > We enable gtk/gnome in distcc that code uses loadavg() > a function unimplemented in uclibc. Therefore for uclibc > we disable gnome and gtk+ features in distcc > > Signed-off-by: Khem Raj > --- > meta/recipes-devtools/distcc/distcc_2.18.3.bb

[OE-core] [PATCH 2/2] distcc_2.18.3.bb: Fix compilation on uclibc

2011-05-20 Thread Khem Raj
We enable gtk/gnome in distcc that code uses loadavg() a function unimplemented in uclibc. Therefore for uclibc we disable gnome and gtk+ features in distcc Signed-off-by: Khem Raj --- meta/recipes-devtools/distcc/distcc_2.18.3.bb | 17 - 1 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 5 de