On Fri, Jan 24, 2020 at 01:47:48PM +0100, Alexander Kanavin wrote:
> I have traced the failing tests to missing supplementary shell scripts that
> apparently are newly added, and weren't packaged to the target.
>
> Also, /tmp indeed wasn't big enough.
>
> With those issues addressed (patch is com
I have traced the failing tests to missing supplementary shell scripts that
apparently are newly added, and weren't packaged to the target.
Also, /tmp indeed wasn't big enough.
With those issues addressed (patch is coming), I am still having two
failures:
# Failed test
(../../../../../lttng-
On Mon, 2020-01-20 at 18:24 +0100, Alexander Kanavin wrote:
> These tests are producing failures that appear and
> disappear randomly. This requires investigation
> by someone with expertise, so let's disable until then.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alexander Kanavin
> ---
> meta/conf/distro/include/ptest
Basically you can view the history of the builds here:
https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/typhoon/#/builders/81
Click on any of the builds (identified by number), even green ones, then
'run-config - > step 1c -> view all lines
For example:
https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/typhoon/#/builders/
Could you point me toward reports for the failing tests?
I just want to make sure they are not actual regression.
A yocto specific patch was dropped that allowed ptest to pass when
lttng-ust is not present. This can be a source of problems.
OE commit:015aea5d93614676decd18578a8ae2d68417cfc5
Also
These tests are producing failures that appear and
disappear randomly. This requires investigation
by someone with expertise, so let's disable until then.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kanavin
---
meta/conf/distro/include/ptest-packagelists.inc | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
d
