On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 10:09:04AM +, Burton, Ross wrote:
> On 27 November 2013 09:09, Laurentiu Palcu wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 07:49:19PM +, Ross Burton wrote:
> >> Drop sysroot patch as a rewritten form has been accepted upstream.
> >
> > How did you test this? The last time I
On 27 November 2013 09:09, Laurentiu Palcu wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 07:49:19PM +, Ross Burton wrote:
>> Drop sysroot patch as a rewritten form has been accepted upstream.
>
> How did you test this? The last time I checked, their implementation was
> not able to generate the cache prope
Hi Ross,
On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 07:49:19PM +, Ross Burton wrote:
> Drop sysroot patch as a rewritten form has been accepted upstream.
How did you test this? The last time I checked, their implementation was
not able to generate the cache properly when using sysroot. Apparently
they didn't b
Drop sysroot patch as a rewritten form has been accepted upstream.
Update license checksums - Google added to COPYING, and the fccache license has
moved.
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton
---
...Add-sysroot-option-to-fc-cache-and-fc-cat.patch | 731
.../fontconfig/fontconfig/sysr
