On 09/11/2013 11:17 AM, Ross Burton wrote:
The existing code for handling PACKAGECONFIG lists wasn't the cleanest Python
around. Instead of diving into the list directly using indices and lengths, use
pop() to iterate through the list.
I started to get some strange behaviour with building wor
The existing code for handling PACKAGECONFIG lists wasn't the cleanest Python
around. Instead of diving into the list directly using indices and lengths, use
pop() to iterate through the list.
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton
---
meta/classes/base.bbclass | 23 ---
1 file change
On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 06:17:27PM +0100, Burton, Ross wrote:
> On 10 September 2013 18:15, Ross Burton wrote:
> > -if num >= 3 and items[2]:
> > -extradeps.append(items[2])
> > -if num >= 4 and items[3]:
> > -extrardeps.appen
On 10 September 2013 18:15, Ross Burton wrote:
> -if num >= 3 and items[2]:
> -extradeps.append(items[2])
> -if num >= 4 and items[3]:
> -extrardeps.append(items[3])
> -if num >= 1 and items[0]:
> -
The existing code for handling PACKAGECONFIG lists wasn't the cleanest Python
around. Instead of diving into the list directly using indices and lengths, use
pop() to iterate through the list.
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton
---
meta/classes/base.bbclass | 17 ++---
1 file changed, 10
