Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/1] systemd: add back alternatives for init utitilies

2018-10-25 Thread richard . purdie
On Wed, 2018-10-24 at 14:16 +0800, ChenQi wrote: > The failure is revealed by Kevin's patches regarding udev-extraconf. > More particularly, it's the following patch that reveals the problem. > "udev-extraconf: Use the canonical file name of systemd" > > I've sent out a patch to remove udev-extra

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/1] systemd: add back alternatives for init utitilies

2018-10-23 Thread ChenQi
On 10/24/2018 05:48 AM, Richard Purdie wrote: On Mon, 2018-10-22 at 15:03 +0800, Chen Qi wrote: Add back alternatives for init utilities to avoid regression. These alternatives were removed when upgradeing systemd to 239. They were removed out of the logic that init utitilies should be bound to

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/1] systemd: add back alternatives for init utitilies

2018-10-23 Thread Richard Purdie
On Mon, 2018-10-22 at 15:03 +0800, Chen Qi wrote: > Add back alternatives for init utilities to avoid regression. > > These alternatives were removed when upgradeing systemd to 239. > They were removed out of the logic that init utitilies should be > bound to init manager. However, it turned out t

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/1] systemd: add back alternatives for init utitilies

2018-10-22 Thread Hongzhi, Song
On 10/22/2018 03:01 PM, ChenQi wrote: On 10/21/2018 05:37 AM, Richard Purdie wrote: On Fri, 2018-10-19 at 13:19 +0800, Chen Qi wrote: Add back alternatives for init utilities to avoid regression. These alternatives were removed when upgradeing systemd to 239. They were removed out of the log

[OE-core] [PATCH 1/1] systemd: add back alternatives for init utitilies

2018-10-21 Thread Chen Qi
Add back alternatives for init utilities to avoid regression. These alternatives were removed when upgradeing systemd to 239. They were removed out of the logic that init utitilies should be bound to init manager. However, it turned out that two use cases were not covered. 1) initramfs using comm

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/1] systemd: add back alternatives for init utitilies

2018-10-21 Thread ChenQi
On 10/21/2018 05:37 AM, Richard Purdie wrote: On Fri, 2018-10-19 at 13:19 +0800, Chen Qi wrote: Add back alternatives for init utilities to avoid regression. These alternatives were removed when upgradeing systemd to 239. They were removed out of the logic that init utitilies should be bound to

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/1] systemd: add back alternatives for init utitilies

2018-10-20 Thread Richard Purdie
On Fri, 2018-10-19 at 13:19 +0800, Chen Qi wrote: > Add back alternatives for init utilities to avoid regression. > > These alternatives were removed when upgradeing systemd to 239. > They were removed out of the logic that init utitilies should be > bound to init manager. However, it turned out t

[OE-core] [PATCH 1/1] systemd: add back alternatives for init utitilies

2018-10-18 Thread Chen Qi
Add back alternatives for init utilities to avoid regression. These alternatives were removed when upgradeing systemd to 239. They were removed out of the logic that init utitilies should be bound to init manager. However, it turned out that two use cases were not covered. 1) initramfs using comm