Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/1] busybox: Include setsid and cttyhack in defconfig

2012-06-18 Thread Darren Hart
On 06/18/2012 04:35 AM, Phil Blundell wrote: > On Sat, 2012-06-16 at 09:38 -0700, Darren Hart wrote: >> With the above goal in mind, can you accept either of my proposed >> patches as an interim solution? Either as an added tiny DISTRO_FEATURE >> or as a simple addition to the defconfig? I do bel

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/1] busybox: Include setsid and cttyhack in defconfig

2012-06-18 Thread Phil Blundell
On Sat, 2012-06-16 at 09:38 -0700, Darren Hart wrote: > With the above goal in mind, can you accept either of my proposed > patches as an interim solution? Either as an added tiny DISTRO_FEATURE > or as a simple addition to the defconfig? I do believe these two > features are useful beyond poky-tin

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/1] busybox: Include setsid and cttyhack in defconfig

2012-06-18 Thread Paul Eggleton
On Monday 18 June 2012 11:26:22 Koen Kooi wrote: > Op 18 jun. 2012, om 09:58 heeft Paul Eggleton het volgende geschreven: > > On Monday 18 June 2012 07:00:19 Koen Kooi wrote: > >> it does force the distro bbappends onto everyone, messing up > >> /etc/hostname > > > > So it did. Now it's fixed. >

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/1] busybox: Include setsid and cttyhack in defconfig

2012-06-18 Thread Koen Kooi
Op 18 jun. 2012, om 09:58 heeft Paul Eggleton het volgende geschreven: > On Monday 18 June 2012 07:00:19 Koen Kooi wrote: >> it does force the distro bbappends onto everyone, messing up /etc/hostname > > So it did. Now it's fixed. Thanks! I'll add it to the angstrom layer stack later this week.

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/1] busybox: Include setsid and cttyhack in defconfig

2012-06-18 Thread Paul Eggleton
On Monday 18 June 2012 07:00:19 Koen Kooi wrote: > it does force the distro bbappends onto everyone, messing up /etc/hostname So it did. Now it's fixed. Paul -- Paul Eggleton Intel Open Source Technology Centre ___ Openembedded-core mailing list Ope

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/1] busybox: Include setsid and cttyhack in defconfig

2012-06-17 Thread Koen Kooi
Op 17 jun. 2012 om 23:14 heeft Paul Eggleton het volgende geschreven: > On Saturday 16 June 2012 21:41:53 Koen Kooi wrote: >> Op 16 jun. 2012, om 16:47 heeft Darren Hart het volgende geschreven: >>> Note that poky-tiny is not currently in its own layer, but is included >>> in the meta-intel la

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/1] busybox: Include setsid and cttyhack in defconfig

2012-06-17 Thread Khem Raj
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 6/17/2012 2:14 PM, Paul Eggleton wrote: > Firstly, I think when Darren said "meta-intel" he meant to say > "meta-yocto" which is where the poky-tiny distro config can be > found (and indeed that is where I would expect to find it). meta-yocto is th

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/1] busybox: Include setsid and cttyhack in defconfig

2012-06-17 Thread Paul Eggleton
On Saturday 16 June 2012 21:41:53 Koen Kooi wrote: > Op 16 jun. 2012, om 16:47 heeft Darren Hart het volgende geschreven: > > Note that poky-tiny is not currently in its own layer, but is included > > in the meta-intel layer. I will look into ways to accomplish this > > without adding to the core b

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/1] busybox: Include setsid and cttyhack in defconfig

2012-06-16 Thread Koen Kooi
Op 16 jun. 2012, om 16:47 heeft Darren Hart het volgende geschreven: > > > On 06/16/2012 10:47 AM, Khem Raj wrote: >> On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 9:38 AM, Darren Hart wrote: >>> >>> >>> On 06/16/2012 09:18 AM, Phil Blundell wrote: On Fri, 2012-06-15 at 15:56 -0700, Darren Hart wrote: >

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/1] busybox: Include setsid and cttyhack in defconfig

2012-06-16 Thread Darren Hart
On 06/16/2012 10:47 AM, Khem Raj wrote: > On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 9:38 AM, Darren Hart wrote: >> >> >> On 06/16/2012 09:18 AM, Phil Blundell wrote: >>> On Fri, 2012-06-15 at 15:56 -0700, Darren Hart wrote: So the delta for including SETSID and CTTYHACK is 2560 bytes. >>> >>> Personally I am

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/1] busybox: Include setsid and cttyhack in defconfig

2012-06-16 Thread Khem Raj
On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 9:38 AM, Darren Hart wrote: > > > On 06/16/2012 09:18 AM, Phil Blundell wrote: >> On Fri, 2012-06-15 at 15:56 -0700, Darren Hart wrote: >>> So the delta for including SETSID and CTTYHACK is 2560 bytes. >> >> Personally I am still not in favour of adding this to the default

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/1] busybox: Include setsid and cttyhack in defconfig

2012-06-16 Thread Darren Hart
On 06/16/2012 09:18 AM, Phil Blundell wrote: > On Fri, 2012-06-15 at 15:56 -0700, Darren Hart wrote: >> So the delta for including SETSID and CTTYHACK is 2560 bytes. > > Personally I am still not in favour of adding this to the default > configuration. I appreciate that it's "only" 2.5k in this

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/1] busybox: Include setsid and cttyhack in defconfig

2012-06-16 Thread Phil Blundell
On Fri, 2012-06-15 at 15:56 -0700, Darren Hart wrote: > So the delta for including SETSID and CTTYHACK is 2560 bytes. Personally I am still not in favour of adding this to the default configuration. I appreciate that it's "only" 2.5k in this case, but every time we make a change like this the bin

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/1] busybox: Include setsid and cttyhack in defconfig

2012-06-15 Thread Darren Hart
On 06/15/2012 03:40 PM, Darren Hart wrote: > When building very small systems, it can be useful to spawn a shell > from a simple init script, rather than a full System V Init > process. This requires the shell be the session leader and be able > to open the controlling terminal if it is to have j

[OE-core] [PATCH 1/1] busybox: Include setsid and cttyhack in defconfig

2012-06-15 Thread Darren Hart
When building very small systems, it can be useful to spawn a shell from a simple init script, rather than a full System V Init process. This requires the shell be the session leader and be able to open the controlling terminal if it is to have job control. Enable CONFIG_CTTYHACK and CONFIG_SETSID