dded-core-boun...@lists.openembedded.org] On Behalf
> Of
> >> Richard Purdie
> >> Sent: Friday, August 05, 2011 9:04 AM
> >> To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
> >> Subject: Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 09/10] x86 tune inc files: add x32 abi
> >
-core layer
Subject: Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 09/10] x86 tune inc files: add x32 abi
tune parameters
On Thu, 2011-08-04 at 08:01 -0700, nitin.a.kam...@intel.com wrote:
From: Nitin A Kamble
Signed-off-by: Nitin A Kamble
---
meta/conf/machine/include/ia32/arch-ia32.inc | 23
Subject: Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 09/10] x86 tune inc files: add x32 abi
> tune parameters
>
> On Thu, 2011-08-04 at 08:01 -0700, nitin.a.kam...@intel.com wrote:
> > From: Nitin A Kamble
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Nitin A Kamble
> > ---
> > meta/conf/machine/include/i
On Thu, 2011-08-04 at 08:01 -0700, nitin.a.kam...@intel.com wrote:
> From: Nitin A Kamble
>
> Signed-off-by: Nitin A Kamble
> ---
> meta/conf/machine/include/ia32/arch-ia32.inc | 23 ---
> meta/conf/machine/include/tune-core2.inc |4
> meta/conf/machine/includ
On Fri, 2011-08-05 at 16:44 +0100, Richard Purdie wrote:
> Equally, there are several precedents for encoding ABI into TARGET_OS,
> arm-gnueabi springs to mind...
>
> It really comes down to the formats that the various magic files accept
> and whilst its the regexps are lax on arm, they are less
On Fri, 2011-08-05 at 16:41 +0100, Phil Blundell wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-08-05 at 08:37 -0700, Kamble, Nitin A wrote:
> > Changing TARGET_ARCH is not correct way to handle it. Because HW/ARCH is
> > not different, the difference is in the ABI of the OS.
>
> Well, I'm not entirely sure I agree with
On Fri, 2011-08-05 at 08:37 -0700, Kamble, Nitin A wrote:
> Changing TARGET_ARCH is not correct way to handle it. Because HW/ARCH is
> not different, the difference is in the ABI of the OS.
Well, I'm not entirely sure I agree with what you're saying here. There
are at least a few precedents for
lto:openembedded-core-boun...@lists.openembedded.org] On Behalf
> Of
> > > Phil Blundell
> > > Sent: Thursday, August 04, 2011 2:57 PM
> > > To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
> > > Subject: Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 09/10] x86 tune inc files: add x
y, August 04, 2011 2:57 PM
> > To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
> > Subject: Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 09/10] x86 tune inc files: add x32 abi
> > tune parameters
> >
> > On Thu, 2011-08-04 at 08:01 -0700, nitin.a.kam...@intel.com wrote:
>
> >
> > On Thu, 2011-08-04 at 08:01 -0700, nitin.a.kam...@intel.com wrote:
> > > # ELF32 ABI
> > > TUNEVALID[m32] = "IA32 ELF32 standard ABI"
> > > -TUNECONFLICTS[m32] = "m64"
> > > +TUNECONFLICTS[m32] = "m64 mx32"
> > > TUNE_ARCH .= "${@bb.utils.contains("TUNE_FEATURES", "m32",
> > "${X86ARCH32
Subject: Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 09/10] x86 tune inc files: add x32 abi
> tune parameters
>
> On Thu, 2011-08-04 at 08:01 -0700, nitin.a.kam...@intel.com wrote:
> > # ELF32 ABI
> > TUNEVALID[m32] = "IA32 ELF32 standard ABI"
> > -TUNECONFLICTS[m32] =
On Thu, 2011-08-04 at 08:01 -0700, nitin.a.kam...@intel.com wrote:
> # ELF32 ABI
> TUNEVALID[m32] = "IA32 ELF32 standard ABI"
> -TUNECONFLICTS[m32] = "m64"
> +TUNECONFLICTS[m32] = "m64 mx32"
> TUNE_ARCH .= "${@bb.utils.contains("TUNE_FEATURES", "m32", "${X86ARCH32}",
> "" ,d)}"
> +ABIEXTENSION
From: Nitin A Kamble
Signed-off-by: Nitin A Kamble
---
meta/conf/machine/include/ia32/arch-ia32.inc | 23 ---
meta/conf/machine/include/tune-core2.inc |4
meta/conf/machine/include/tune-x86_64.inc|2 +-
3 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
13 matches
Mail list logo
