On 01/14/2013 08:10 PM, Saul Wold wrote:
On 01/14/2013 09:16 AM, Radu Moisan wrote:
On 01/12/2013 01:23 AM, Saul Wold wrote:
On 01/08/2013 04:24 AM, Radu Moisan wrote:
As Ross suggested I've done the following changes to the previous set:
* added two patches (the first two) that address mult
On 01/14/2013 09:16 AM, Radu Moisan wrote:
On 01/12/2013 01:23 AM, Saul Wold wrote:
On 01/08/2013 04:24 AM, Radu Moisan wrote:
As Ross suggested I've done the following changes to the previous set:
* added two patches (the first two) that address multiple init
systems support,\
as in shifting
On 01/12/2013 01:23 AM, Saul Wold wrote:
On 01/08/2013 04:24 AM, Radu Moisan wrote:
As Ross suggested I've done the following changes to the previous set:
* added two patches (the first two) that address multiple init
systems support,\
as in shifting from default hardcoded sysvinit to somethin
On 01/11/2013 07:45 PM, Saul Wold wrote:
On 01/11/2013 07:12 AM, Radu Moisan wrote:
On 01/10/2013 08:27 PM, Khem Raj wrote:
On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 12:02 AM, Radu Moisan
wrote:
On 01/09/2013 07:14 PM, Khem Raj wrote:
On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 4:24 AM, Radu Moisan
wrote:
As Ross suggested I'v
When add it in the oe-core?
On Friday, January 11, 2013 03:23:06 PM Saul Wold wrote:
> On 01/08/2013 04:24 AM, Radu Moisan wrote:
> > As Ross suggested I've done the following changes to the previous set:
> > * added two patches (the first two) that address multiple init systems
> > support,\ as i
On 01/08/2013 04:24 AM, Radu Moisan wrote:
As Ross suggested I've done the following changes to the previous set:
* added two patches (the first two) that address multiple init systems support,\
as in shifting from default hardcoded sysvinit to something more generic while
the default values stil
On 01/11/2013 07:12 AM, Radu Moisan wrote:
On 01/10/2013 08:27 PM, Khem Raj wrote:
On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 12:02 AM, Radu Moisan
wrote:
On 01/09/2013 07:14 PM, Khem Raj wrote:
On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 4:24 AM, Radu Moisan
wrote:
As Ross suggested I've done the following changes to the previo
On 01/10/2013 08:27 PM, Khem Raj wrote:
On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 12:02 AM, Radu Moisan wrote:
On 01/09/2013 07:14 PM, Khem Raj wrote:
On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 4:24 AM, Radu Moisan wrote:
As Ross suggested I've done the following changes to the previous set:
* added two patches (the first two)
On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 12:02 AM, Radu Moisan wrote:
>
> On 01/09/2013 07:14 PM, Khem Raj wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 4:24 AM, Radu Moisan wrote:
>>>
>>> As Ross suggested I've done the following changes to the previous set:
>>> * added two patches (the first two) that address multiple in
On 01/09/2013 07:14 PM, Khem Raj wrote:
On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 4:24 AM, Radu Moisan wrote:
As Ross suggested I've done the following changes to the previous set:
* added two patches (the first two) that address multiple init systems support,\
as in shifting from default hardcoded sysvinit to s
On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 4:24 AM, Radu Moisan wrote:
> As Ross suggested I've done the following changes to the previous set:
> * added two patches (the first two) that address multiple init systems
> support,\
> as in shifting from default hardcoded sysvinit to something more generic while
> the d
On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 7:01 AM, Radu Moisan wrote:
> Was this removal done on purpose?
>
>
> I had to port the patch manually so I guess it got lost then. Do we want to
> have Sign-off-by from author as well?
>
absolutely thats the purpose of SOB to track to certificate of origin
you should have
On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 8:51 AM, Saul Wold wrote:
>> | ./.libs/libsystemd-daemon.so: undefined reference to `mq_getattr'
>> | collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
>> | make[2]: *** [test-daemon] Error 1
>> | rm units/console-shell.service.m4
>> src/core/org.freedesktop.systemd1.policy.in unit
On 01/08/2013 04:24 AM, Radu Moisan wrote:
As Ross suggested I've done the following changes to the previous set:
* added two patches (the first two) that address multiple init systems support,\
as in shifting from default hardcoded sysvinit to something more generic while
the default values stil
2013/1/8 Radu Moisan :
>
> On 01/08/2013 04:57 PM, Burton, Ross wrote:
>>
>> On 8 January 2013 15:01, Radu Moisan wrote:
>>>
>>> I am pretty sure that I added a 'Signed-off-by:' field to my patch but
>>> it is missing in the commit. Other patches don't have the signed-off-by
>>> of the original a
Radu Moisan writes:
> No question about that, the question was whether to add Sign-off-by
> from the author itself. I know that we are doing it like that right
> now, but I don't understand it's reasoning. Being the author of a
> patch what would be the point in adding a Sign-off-by with the same
On 8 January 2013 15:11, Radu Moisan wrote:
> No question about that, the question was whether to add Sign-off-by from the
> author itself. I know that we are doing it like that right now, but I don't
> understand it's reasoning. Being the author of a patch what would be the
> point in adding a Si
On 01/08/2013 04:57 PM, Burton, Ross wrote:
On 8 January 2013 15:01, Radu Moisan wrote:
I am pretty sure that I added a 'Signed-off-by:' field to my patch but
it is missing in the commit. Other patches don't have the signed-off-by
of the original author neither.
Was this removal done on purp
On 8 January 2013 15:01, Radu Moisan wrote:
> I am pretty sure that I added a 'Signed-off-by:' field to my patch but
> it is missing in the commit. Other patches don't have the signed-off-by
> of the original author neither.
>
> Was this removal done on purpose?
>
>
> I had to port the patch manu
On 01/08/2013 02:57 PM, Enrico Scholz wrote:
Radu Moisan
writes:
Enrico Scholz (1):
systemd: move disable operation into prerm() script
http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit.cgi/poky-contrib/commit/?h=rmoisan/systemd&id=e01411c2400231a89bc76a229b38e7eb95b7cd81
I am pretty sure that I add
Radu Moisan
writes:
> Enrico Scholz (1):
> systemd: move disable operation into prerm() script
http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit.cgi/poky-contrib/commit/?h=rmoisan/systemd&id=e01411c2400231a89bc76a229b38e7eb95b7cd81
I am pretty sure that I added a 'Signed-off-by:' field to my patch but
it
As Ross suggested I've done the following changes to the previous set:
* added two patches (the first two) that address multiple init systems support,\
as in shifting from default hardcoded sysvinit to something more generic while
the default values still remains on sysvinit
* moved automatic setti
22 matches
Mail list logo
