On Wed, Nov 24, 2021 at 9:46 AM Ross Burton wrote:
>
> On Tue, 23 Nov 2021 at 21:57, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
> > We weren't able to even run the validation at all, due to the kernel
> > calling pkg-config directly to check for libyaml, which is the target
> > pkgconfig and failing on missing depend
On Tue, 23 Nov 2021 at 21:57, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
> We weren't able to even run the validation at all, due to the kernel
> calling pkg-config directly to check for libyaml, which is the target
> pkgconfig and failing on missing dependencies. Rather than patching
> the kernel, I've finally given
On Tue, Nov 23, 2021 at 4:57 PM wrote:
>
> From: Bruce Ashfield
>
> Richard,
>
> There's a few routine -stable updates at the start of this, and then some
> more painful (and RFC) commits.
>
> As part of this series, we fix one pkg-config issue that was preventing
> x86 from doing stack valildati
On Tue, Nov 23, 2021 at 6:59 PM Khem Raj wrote:
>
> dont forget to send removal patch for meta-python once they are in core.
Definitely!
This may take a while to sort out, but I have one ready and will send
when required.
Bruce
>
> On Tue, Nov 23, 2021 at 1:57 PM Bruce Ashfield
> wrote:
> >
dont forget to send removal patch for meta-python once they are in core.
On Tue, Nov 23, 2021 at 1:57 PM Bruce Ashfield wrote:
>
> From: Bruce Ashfield
>
> Richard,
>
> There's a few routine -stable updates at the start of this, and then some
> more painful (and RFC) commits.
>
> As part of this
From: Bruce Ashfield
Richard,
There's a few routine -stable updates at the start of this, and then some
more painful (and RFC) commits.
As part of this series, we fix one pkg-config issue that was preventing
x86 from doing stack valildation during build. At one point it was
increasing my build
