On Wed, 2013-01-23 at 00:04 +0200, Ciprian Ciubotariu wrote:
> On Monday 21 January 2013 12:12:14 Burton, Ross wrote:
> > On 21 January 2013 03:30, Ciprian Ciubotariu wrote:
> > > However, with oe-core/meta providing a default embedded policy, higher
> > > layers need to remove sysvinit or systemd
On Monday 21 January 2013 12:12:14 Burton, Ross wrote:
> On 21 January 2013 03:30, Ciprian Ciubotariu wrote:
> > However, with oe-core/meta providing a default embedded policy, higher
> > layers need to remove sysvinit or systemd stuff from base recipes, which
> > is
> > against bitbake's additive
On 01/22/2013 11:30 AM, ChenQi wrote:
On 01/20/2013 06:47 AM, Ross Burton wrote:
Hi,
This series has the goal of enabling core-image-minimal to boot using
systemd.
As such it touches no real services, just the infrastructural tweaks
to make the
init manager a distribution choice, systemd itse
On 01/20/2013 06:47 AM, Ross Burton wrote:
Hi,
This series has the goal of enabling core-image-minimal to boot using systemd.
As such it touches no real services, just the infrastructural tweaks to make the
init manager a distribution choice, systemd itself, and a few low-level changes.
95% of
On 21 January 2013 16:57, Saul Wold wrote:
> Ouch, I thought that this was one of the goals of the select your init
> system, ie don't use either sysvinit or systemd. Poky-Tiny has a single
> file rc.local script to do the initialization of the system.
And presumably a poky-tiny image doesn't pu
On 01/21/2013 04:12 AM, Burton, Ross wrote:
On 21 January 2013 03:30, Ciprian Ciubotariu wrote:
However, with oe-core/meta providing a default embedded policy, higher
layers need to remove sysvinit or systemd stuff from base recipes, which is
against bitbake's additive language design (only app
On 21 January 2013 03:30, Ciprian Ciubotariu wrote:
> However, with oe-core/meta providing a default embedded policy, higher
> layers need to remove sysvinit or systemd stuff from base recipes, which is
> against bitbake's additive language design (only append/prepend functions,
> no -= operator)
On 21 January 2013 03:57, Saul Wold wrote:
> Another thing I just noticed is that many of these patches are missing
> either Signed-off-by or Upstream-Status Tags!
Yes. I meant to wipe out the uclibc patches for now to reduce the
attribution-chasing, but forgot. I'll work on that next.
Ross
__
On 21 January 2013 10:14, Richard Purdie
wrote:
> This isn't enough to prevent warnings for "bitbake world". We need to
> detect which is enabled and then SkipPackage in the one that isn't
> needed, or at least exclude it from the world build.
Patches sent so udev and systemd skip if the other is
On Mon, 2013-01-21 at 09:19 +0100, Eric Bénard wrote:
> Hi Ross,
>
> Le Mon, 21 Jan 2013 08:08:32 +,
> "Burton, Ross" a écrit :
>
> > The autobuilder hit this last night:
> >
> > ERROR: Multiple .bb files are due to be built which each provide udev
> > (/srv/home/pokybuild/yocto-autobuilder
On 21 January 2013 08:59, Martin Jansa wrote:
> Why weren't changes from
> meta-systemd/oe-core/recipes-connectivity/connman/connman_1.10.bbappend
> merged to oe-core?
Because I'm 90% sure connman isn't the only package that does runtime
detection of systemd. As I said in the original mail, the
On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 08:21:18PM +, Burton, Ross wrote:
> On 20 January 2013 18:34, Saul Wold wrote:
> > This change introduced a new warning about un-packaged files:
> >
> >> WARNING: QA Issue: connman: Files/directories were installed but not
> >> shipped
> >> /lib
> >> /lib/systemd
>
On 01/21/2013 10:19 AM, Eric Bénard wrote:
Hi Ross,
Le Mon, 21 Jan 2013 08:08:32 +,
"Burton, Ross" a écrit :
The autobuilder hit this last night:
ERROR: Multiple .bb files are due to be built which each provide udev
(/srv/home/pokybuild/yocto-autobuilder/yocto-slave/nightly-world/build/
Hi Ross,
Le Mon, 21 Jan 2013 08:08:32 +,
"Burton, Ross" a écrit :
> The autobuilder hit this last night:
>
> ERROR: Multiple .bb files are due to be built which each provide udev
> (/srv/home/pokybuild/yocto-autobuilder/yocto-slave/nightly-world/build/meta/recipes-core/udev/udev_182.bb
> /s
The autobuilder hit this last night:
ERROR: Multiple .bb files are due to be built which each provide udev
(/srv/home/pokybuild/yocto-autobuilder/yocto-slave/nightly-world/build/meta/recipes-core/udev/udev_182.bb
/srv/home/pokybuild/yocto-autobuilder/yocto-slave/nightly-world/build/meta/recipes-co
On 01/20/2013 10:34 AM, Saul Wold wrote:
On 01/19/2013 02:47 PM, Ross Burton wrote:
Hi,
This series has the goal of enabling core-image-minimal to boot using
systemd.
As such it touches no real services, just the infrastructural tweaks
to make the
init manager a distribution choice, systemd its
Hello.
I am merely a user of the free OpenEmbedded, and I was quite happy to
see that OpenEmbedded was heading towards providing multiple init
managers (be it sysvinit, systemd, openrc, upstart or what not).
However, from this series of patches it seems to me that systemd usage
is added to the ope
On 20 January 2013 18:34, Saul Wold wrote:
> This change introduced a new warning about un-packaged files:
>
>> WARNING: QA Issue: connman: Files/directories were installed but not
>> shipped
>> /lib
>> /lib/systemd
>> /lib/systemd/system
>> /lib/systemd/system/connman.service
That will b
On 01/19/2013 02:47 PM, Ross Burton wrote:
Hi,
This series has the goal of enabling core-image-minimal to boot using systemd.
As such it touches no real services, just the infrastructural tweaks to make the
init manager a distribution choice, systemd itself, and a few low-level changes.
95% of
Hi,
This series has the goal of enabling core-image-minimal to boot using systemd.
As such it touches no real services, just the infrastructural tweaks to make the
init manager a distribution choice, systemd itself, and a few low-level changes.
95% of the credit obviously must go to the contribut
20 matches
Mail list logo
