On Fri, 2014-03-14 at 23:03 +0800, Robert Yang wrote:
>
> On 03/14/2014 01:45 AM, Burton, Ross wrote:
> > On 11 March 2014 17:08, Robert Yang wrote:
> >> Robert Yang (6):
> >>classes/archive*.bbclass: remove archive-*-source.bbclass
> >>archiver.bbclass: refactor it
> >>package_rpm.bb
Hi Robert,
On Wednesday 12 March 2014 01:08:18 Robert Yang wrote:
> === V3:
> * Do the unpack, patch and configure in another WORKDIR as RP and Ross
> suggested, so that it would not affact the default build dependencies,
> thanks for Ross' prototype.
> * Don't archive the logs (temp/log.do*),
On 03/14/2014 01:45 AM, Burton, Ross wrote:
On 11 March 2014 17:08, Robert Yang wrote:
Robert Yang (6):
classes/archive*.bbclass: remove archive-*-source.bbclass
archiver.bbclass: refactor it
package_rpm.bbclass: archive the source to srpm package
archiver.bbclass: move a few code
On 11 March 2014 17:08, Robert Yang wrote:
> Robert Yang (6):
> classes/archive*.bbclass: remove archive-*-source.bbclass
> archiver.bbclass: refactor it
> package_rpm.bbclass: archive the source to srpm package
> archiver.bbclass: move a few code to copyleft_compliance.bbclass
> local.c
=== V3:
* Do the unpack, patch and configure in another WORKDIR as RP and Ross
suggested, so that it would not affact the default build dependencies,
thanks for Ross' prototype.
* Don't archive the logs (temp/log.do*), mainly because of:
- We can easily get the log via reset the T rather than
