On Mon, Aug 12, 2024 at 5:47 AM Richard Purdie
wrote:
>
> Hi Bruce,
>
> On Sun, 2024-08-11 at 14:04 -0400, bruce.ashfi...@gmail.com wrote:
> > This is mainly a v3 of the 6.10 introduction series, but I've
> > also included a 6.6 version bump and 6.11 for -dev.
> >
> > This should fix the:
> >
> >
Hi Bruce,
On Sun, 2024-08-11 at 14:04 -0400, bruce.ashfi...@gmail.com wrote:
> This is mainly a v3 of the 6.10 introduction series, but I've
> also included a 6.6 version bump and 6.11 for -dev.
>
> This should fix the:
>
> - trap seen on multiple machines with 6.10.3, I've disabled a
> NF
From: Bruce Ashfield
Richard,
This is mainly a v3 of the 6.10 introduction series, but I've
also included a 6.6 version bump and 6.11 for -dev.
This should fix the:
- trap seen on multiple machines with 6.10.3, I've disabled a
NFS option that was introduced in .3 (and shoulldn't have
From: Bruce Ashfield
Richard,
Here's the latest round of configuration and -stable udpates that
I've collected.
Nothing major, but hopefully the virtio patches will help some of
the AB issues.
Bruce
The following changes since commit da95831d91b1265ecaee5bbfaeb1caaa2c290838:
scons: Pass MA
On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 9:18 AM Bruce Ashfield wrote:
>
> From: Bruce Ashfield
>
> Richard,
>
> Here's my next set of collected changes for linux-yocto. I built and booted
> the
> 5.4 -stable bump .. and obviously it looks good.
>
> I've also grabbed a pending devsrc change, that looks good to m
From: Bruce Ashfield
Richard,
Here's my next set of collected changes for linux-yocto. I built and booted the
5.4 -stable bump .. and obviously it looks good.
I've also grabbed a pending devsrc change, that looks good to me.
Finally, I have a fix Khem sent for perf builds. I kept 5.4 and 5.8 s
From: Bruce Ashfield
Hi Richard,
As discussed earlier, this is the pull request which contains a temporary
revert of the CONFIG_IKHEADERS config change that was causing the
periodic issues.
I added a kernel feature that can be used to enable the configuration from
a recipe, that way I won't lea
On Thu, May 7, 2020 at 2:15 PM Steve Sakoman wrote:
>
> From the discussion to this point it seems that these patches aren't
> quite ready for dunfell. Let me know if/when that changes, or if I'm
> mistaken in that assumption!
Richard merged 3 of the 4 kernel updates (up to v5.4.34), so they are
>From the discussion to this point it seems that these patches aren't
quite ready for dunfell. Let me know if/when that changes, or if I'm
mistaken in that assumption!
Steve
On Mon, May 4, 2020 at 3:34 AM Bruce Ashfield wrote:
>
> On Mon, May 4, 2020 at 9:24 AM Richard Purdie
> wrote:
> >
> >
On Mon, May 4, 2020 at 9:24 AM Richard Purdie
wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2020-05-04 at 09:06 -0400, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
> > On Mon, May 4, 2020 at 8:56 AM Bruce Ashfield via
> > lists.openembedded.org
> > wrote:
> > > On Mon, May 4, 2020 at 4:31 AM Richard Purdie
> > > wrote:
> > > > Hi Bruce,
> > > >
On Mon, 2020-05-04 at 09:06 -0400, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
> On Mon, May 4, 2020 at 8:56 AM Bruce Ashfield via
> lists.openembedded.org
> wrote:
> > On Mon, May 4, 2020 at 4:31 AM Richard Purdie
> > wrote:
> > > Hi Bruce,
> > >
> > > On Sun, 2020-05-03 at 11:44 -0400, bruce.ashfi...@gmail.com wrot
On Mon, May 4, 2020 at 8:56 AM Bruce Ashfield via
lists.openembedded.org
wrote:
>
> On Mon, May 4, 2020 at 4:31 AM Richard Purdie
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Bruce,
> >
> > On Sun, 2020-05-03 at 11:44 -0400, bruce.ashfi...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > From: Bruce Ashfield
> > >
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > Here
On Mon, May 4, 2020 at 4:31 AM Richard Purdie
wrote:
>
> Hi Bruce,
>
> On Sun, 2020-05-03 at 11:44 -0400, bruce.ashfi...@gmail.com wrote:
> > From: Bruce Ashfield
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Here are the -stable updates I've collected since m3 of dunfell. I
> > ran things through the autobuilder, and
Hi Bruce,
On Sun, 2020-05-03 at 11:44 -0400, bruce.ashfi...@gmail.com wrote:
> From: Bruce Ashfield
>
> Hi all,
>
> Here are the -stable updates I've collected since m3 of dunfell. I
> ran things through the autobuilder, and no new kernel issues were
> picked up.
>
> The -dev bump is good for
From: Bruce Ashfield
Hi all,
Here are the -stable updates I've collected since m3 of dunfell. I ran
things through the autobuilder, and no new kernel issues were picked up.
The -dev bump is good for master, while all of the 5.4-stable bumps are
good for both master and dunfell.
Cheers,
Bruce
From: Bruce Ashfield
Hi all,
Here's the queued bug fixes for linux-yocto. It has khem's identified fixes
for the kernel selftest issues with the latest -stable udpates, as well as
some BSP fixes and config changes.
I ran this through the AB and everything came back green.
I've done this in mul
Hi all,
Here's the latest batch of linux-yocto (4.1 and 4.4) changes. They are
-stable updates, a memory leak fix and configuration tweaks (in particular
the removal of debug kernel from the printk fragment).
This is a slight overlap with another series that I sent before, since I
noticed some mi
Hi all,
Here's the latest set of changes to the 4.1 and 4.4 linux-yocto
kernel's. Nothing particularly exciting, mainline backports and
minor fixups.
Cheers,
Bruce
The following changes since commit 84cce1d49ddb75025ec454d758fbc8d369920122:
e2fsprogs: remove the extra dot from the recipe fil
Hi all,
This series contains some changes that I've been gathering over the past
week. Nothing serious, just BSP mainline backports, configuration tweaks
to tiny (for usability) and a change to make aufs4 opt-in (versus always
on).
I've built and booted this for qemu* (standard and -rt).
Cheers,
On 2015-05-06 06:49 PM, Martin Jansa wrote:
I use tmpfs in most of my builds, so in most cases when I see the error
from the build, tmpfs is already gone (purged by next build executed on
the same sever).
ross just found something like this in one of his local builds .. I'm
pretty sure I see th
> On May 6, 2015, at 8:33 AM, Martin Jansa wrote:
>
> I'm considering providing simple old-style recipes for vanilla kernels
> and using them in my jenkins builds instead linux-yocto, because kernel
> shouldn't block testing other recipes from meta-oe and other layers as
> often as linux-yocto d
I use tmpfs in most of my builds, so in most cases when I see the error
from the build, tmpfs is already gone (purged by next build executed on the
same sever).
On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 11:32 PM, Richard Purdie <
richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> On Wed, 2015-05-06 at 13:46 -0400, Bruce
On Wed, 2015-05-06 at 13:46 -0400, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
> On 2015-05-06 12:07 PM, Martin Jansa wrote:
> > I've used master-next week or two ago (mostly to test bluez4 and python3
> > changes) and soon after that dropped all linux-yocto related changes
> > from it assuming that it's indeed cause fo
On 2015-05-06 12:07 PM, Martin Jansa wrote:
On Wed, May 06, 2015 at 04:44:46PM +0100, Richard Purdie wrote:
On Wed, 2015-05-06 at 17:33 +0200, Martin Jansa wrote:
On Wed, May 06, 2015 at 10:58:36AM -0400, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
On 2015-05-06 10:42 AM, Martin Jansa wrote:
At this point, all I ca
On Wed, May 06, 2015 at 04:44:46PM +0100, Richard Purdie wrote:
> On Wed, 2015-05-06 at 17:33 +0200, Martin Jansa wrote:
> > On Wed, May 06, 2015 at 10:58:36AM -0400, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
> > > On 2015-05-06 10:42 AM, Martin Jansa wrote:
> > > At this point, all I can say is file a bug. My builds
On Wed, 2015-05-06 at 17:33 +0200, Martin Jansa wrote:
> On Wed, May 06, 2015 at 10:58:36AM -0400, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
> > On 2015-05-06 10:42 AM, Martin Jansa wrote:
> > At this point, all I can say is file a bug. My builds of the same
> > board work, and the autobuilder show up green.
> >
> >
On Wed, May 06, 2015 at 10:58:36AM -0400, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
> On 2015-05-06 10:42 AM, Martin Jansa wrote:
> > On Sat, May 02, 2015 at 10:50:53PM -0400, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
> >> On 2015-05-02 4:13 AM, Martin Jansa wrote:
> >>> On Fri, May 01, 2015 at 07:30:24PM -0400, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
> >
On 2015-05-06 10:42 AM, Martin Jansa wrote:
On Sat, May 02, 2015 at 10:50:53PM -0400, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
On 2015-05-02 4:13 AM, Martin Jansa wrote:
On Fri, May 01, 2015 at 07:30:24PM -0400, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
On 2015-05-01 6:59 PM, Richard Purdie wrote:
On Thu, 2015-04-30 at 21:34 -0400
On 2015-05-03 05:30 PM, Richard Purdie wrote:
On Thu, 2015-04-30 at 21:34 -0400, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
Here is the latest consolidated pull request for the supported linux-yocto
kernels.
- We have a refresh of the 3.14-rt support
- bluetooh configuration changes for common-pc/qemux86
- br
On 2015-05-03 5:30 PM, Richard Purdie wrote:
On Thu, 2015-04-30 at 21:34 -0400, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
Here is the latest consolidated pull request for the supported linux-yocto
kernels.
- We have a refresh of the 3.14-rt support
- bluetooh configuration changes for common-pc/qemux86
- bra
On Thu, 2015-04-30 at 21:34 -0400, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
> Here is the latest consolidated pull request for the supported linux-yocto
> kernels.
>
> - We have a refresh of the 3.14-rt support
> - bluetooh configuration changes for common-pc/qemux86
> - braswell BSP features and fixes
> - Intro
On Sat, 2015-05-02 at 23:52 -0400, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
> On 2015-05-02 5:00 AM, Richard Purdie wrote:
> > On Fri, 2015-05-01 at 19:30 -0400, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
> >> On 2015-05-01 6:59 PM, Richard Purdie wrote:
> >>> On Thu, 2015-04-30 at 21:34 -0400, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
> Here is the la
On 2015-05-02 5:00 AM, Richard Purdie wrote:
On Fri, 2015-05-01 at 19:30 -0400, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
On 2015-05-01 6:59 PM, Richard Purdie wrote:
On Thu, 2015-04-30 at 21:34 -0400, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
Here is the latest consolidated pull request for the supported linux-yocto
kernels.
-
On 2015-05-02 5:00 AM, Richard Purdie wrote:
On Fri, 2015-05-01 at 19:30 -0400, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
On 2015-05-01 6:59 PM, Richard Purdie wrote:
On Thu, 2015-04-30 at 21:34 -0400, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
Here is the latest consolidated pull request for the supported linux-yocto
kernels.
-
On 2015-05-02 4:13 AM, Martin Jansa wrote:
On Fri, May 01, 2015 at 07:30:24PM -0400, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
On 2015-05-01 6:59 PM, Richard Purdie wrote:
On Thu, 2015-04-30 at 21:34 -0400, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
Here is the latest consolidated pull request for the supported linux-yocto
kernels.
On Fri, 2015-05-01 at 19:30 -0400, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
> On 2015-05-01 6:59 PM, Richard Purdie wrote:
> > On Thu, 2015-04-30 at 21:34 -0400, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
> >> Here is the latest consolidated pull request for the supported linux-yocto
> >> kernels.
> >>
> >> - We have a refresh of the 3
On Fri, May 01, 2015 at 07:30:24PM -0400, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
> On 2015-05-01 6:59 PM, Richard Purdie wrote:
> > On Thu, 2015-04-30 at 21:34 -0400, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
> >> Here is the latest consolidated pull request for the supported linux-yocto
> >> kernels.
> >>
> >> - We have a refresh o
On 2015-05-01 6:59 PM, Richard Purdie wrote:
On Thu, 2015-04-30 at 21:34 -0400, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
Here is the latest consolidated pull request for the supported linux-yocto
kernels.
- We have a refresh of the 3.14-rt support
- bluetooh configuration changes for common-pc/qemux86
- bra
On Thu, 2015-04-30 at 21:34 -0400, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
> Here is the latest consolidated pull request for the supported linux-yocto
> kernels.
>
> - We have a refresh of the 3.14-rt support
> - bluetooh configuration changes for common-pc/qemux86
> - braswell BSP features and fixes
> - Intro
Here is the latest consolidated pull request for the supported linux-yocto
kernels.
- We have a refresh of the 3.14-rt support
- bluetooh configuration changes for common-pc/qemux86
- braswell BSP features and fixes
- Introduction of the 4.1-rc1 -dev kernel (and associated perf fix).
I've bui
On Wed, 2015-03-25 at 09:26 -0400, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 8:13 AM, Bruce Ashfield
> wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 5:26 AM, Richard Purdie
> > wrote:
> >> On Tue, 2015-03-24 at 14:57 -0400, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
> >>> Hi all,
> >>>
> >>> Here is the latest linux-yocto
On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 8:13 AM, Bruce Ashfield
wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 5:26 AM, Richard Purdie
> wrote:
>> On Tue, 2015-03-24 at 14:57 -0400, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> Here is the latest linux-yocto consolidated pull request. It is a mix of
>>> kernel version -stable imp
On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 5:26 AM, Richard Purdie
wrote:
> On Tue, 2015-03-24 at 14:57 -0400, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Here is the latest linux-yocto consolidated pull request. It is a mix of
>> kernel version -stable imports (CVEs and fixes), kernel configuration
>> changes, a documen
On Tue, 2015-03-24 at 14:57 -0400, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Here is the latest linux-yocto consolidated pull request. It is a mix of
> kernel version -stable imports (CVEs and fixes), kernel configuration
> changes, a documentation update and kernel configuration enhancement.
>
> The
Hi all,
Here is the latest linux-yocto consolidated pull request. It is a mix of
kernel version -stable imports (CVEs and fixes), kernel configuration
changes, a documentation update and kernel configuration enhancement.
The -stable updates are routine, and I build/boot tested them here
(with my
Richard/Saul,
Here is the latest version of the 3.19 kernel update for the 1.8 release.
This has been soaking in linux-yocto-dev, has had my local tests
(core-image-kernel-dev, core-image-sato) and has had a run through the
AB.
I've bumped the libc-headers version to match.
So our coverage is g
On 13-08-24 9:50 AM, Saul Wold wrote:
On 08/24/2013 06:45 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
On 13-08-24 9:34 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
On 13-08-24 2:33 AM, Saul Wold wrote:
On 08/23/2013 11:08 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
Richard/Saul,
Here's my consolidated set of changes that represent the biggest ch
On 13-08-24 9:50 AM, Saul Wold wrote:
On 08/24/2013 06:45 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
On 13-08-24 9:34 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
On 13-08-24 2:33 AM, Saul Wold wrote:
On 08/23/2013 11:08 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
Richard/Saul,
Here's my consolidated set of changes that represent the biggest ch
On 13-08-24 9:50 AM, Saul Wold wrote:
On 08/24/2013 06:45 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
On 13-08-24 9:34 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
On 13-08-24 2:33 AM, Saul Wold wrote:
On 08/23/2013 11:08 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
Richard/Saul,
Here's my consolidated set of changes that represent the biggest ch
On 13-08-24 9:50 AM, Saul Wold wrote:
On 08/24/2013 06:45 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
On 13-08-24 9:34 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
On 13-08-24 2:33 AM, Saul Wold wrote:
On 08/23/2013 11:08 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
Richard/Saul,
Here's my consolidated set of changes that represent the biggest ch
On 08/24/2013 06:45 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
On 13-08-24 9:34 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
On 13-08-24 2:33 AM, Saul Wold wrote:
On 08/23/2013 11:08 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
Richard/Saul,
Here's my consolidated set of changes that represent the biggest chunk
of work for the Yocto 1.5 release.
On 13-08-24 9:34 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
On 13-08-24 2:33 AM, Saul Wold wrote:
On 08/23/2013 11:08 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
Richard/Saul,
Here's my consolidated set of changes that represent the biggest chunk
of work for the Yocto 1.5 release. The obvious change is that the 3.10
kernel is n
On 13-08-24 2:33 AM, Saul Wold wrote:
On 08/23/2013 11:08 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
Richard/Saul,
Here's my consolidated set of changes that represent the biggest chunk
of work for the Yocto 1.5 release. The obvious change is that the 3.10
kernel is now the latest linux-yocto kernel (and linux-
On 08/23/2013 11:08 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
Richard/Saul,
Here's my consolidated set of changes that represent the biggest chunk
of work for the Yocto 1.5 release. The obvious change is that the 3.10
kernel is now the latest linux-yocto kernel (and linux-yocto-dev will
mark on). I've built and
On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 2:08 PM, Bruce Ashfield
wrote:
> Richard/Saul,
>
> Here's my consolidated set of changes that represent the biggest chunk
> of work for the Yocto 1.5 release. The obvious change is that the 3.10
> kernel is now the latest linux-yocto kernel (and linux-yocto-dev will
> mark
Richard/Saul,
Here's my consolidated set of changes that represent the biggest chunk
of work for the Yocto 1.5 release. The obvious change is that the 3.10
kernel is now the latest linux-yocto kernel (and linux-yocto-dev will
mark on). I've built and booted core-image-sato for all the oe-core
qemu
On 02/04/2012 10:31 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
Richard/Saul,
This is a follow on to the 3.2 tree and src_patches changes that I sent
last week.
The ability to specify out of tree BSPs via single .scc files is not
possible, as well as any automatic BSPs following the naming conventions
of the 3.2
Richard/Saul,
This is a follow on to the 3.2 tree and src_patches changes that I sent
last week.
The ability to specify out of tree BSPs via single .scc files is not
possible, as well as any automatic BSPs following the naming conventions
of the 3.2 tree.
The meta branch changes are routine, wi
On 01/11/2012 10:52 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
Richard/Saul,
Since this is a stabilization week, this probably can't be merged
immediately, but I've been working with this enough to call it
good enough, and me sitting on them longer doesn't help.
The first change in this series is the switch of
Richard/Saul,
Since this is a stabilization week, this probably can't be merged
immediately, but I've been working with this enough to call it
good enough, and me sitting on them longer doesn't help.
The first change in this series is the switch of qemuppc from prep to
mac99. With this, we'll clo
60 matches
Mail list logo
