Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 0/4] Replace busybox for variable.

2015-12-15 Thread Joya Cruz, Alejandro
Ping AJ On mar, 2015-12-01 at 20:27 +, Joya Cruz, Alejandro wrote: > ping > On jue, 2015-11-26 at 18:34 +, Joya Cruz, Alejandro wrote: > > Any feedback about this? > > > > On mar, 2015-11-17 at 16:13 -0600, Alejandro Joya wrote: > > > These recipes have a hardcoded dependency to busybox, >

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 0/4] Replace busybox for variable.

2015-12-01 Thread Joya Cruz, Alejandro
ping On jue, 2015-11-26 at 18:34 +, Joya Cruz, Alejandro wrote: > Any feedback about this? > > On mar, 2015-11-17 at 16:13 -0600, Alejandro Joya wrote: > > These recipes have a hardcoded dependency to busybox, > > in order to be able to have a flexible selection, > > instead of the hardcoded d

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 0/4] Replace busybox for variable.

2015-11-26 Thread Joya Cruz, Alejandro
Any feedback about this? On mar, 2015-11-17 at 16:13 -0600, Alejandro Joya wrote: > These recipes have a hardcoded dependency to busybox, > in order to be able to have a flexible selection, > instead of the hardcoded dependency, now it is point to virtual reference > base-utils. > > The followin

[OE-core] [PATCH 0/4] Replace busybox for variable

2015-11-17 Thread Alejandro Joya
These recipes have a hardcoded dependency to busybox, in order to be able to have a flexible selection, instead of the hardcoded dependency, now it is point to virtual reference base-utils. The following changes since commit 6f98c39418c60b7c0b25b30983d2e5257158a6a4: gcc: Drop 4.8 (2015-11-16 1