Patches are ok. I was wondering if BACKPORTS variable was good enough for
cve patches too. Anyway the patch name ha cve informations
On Jan 25, 2016 12:35 PM, "Armin Kuster" wrote:
> noticed this did not hit the patchwork. resending.
>
> Please consider these for the next fido update.
>
> The fol
noticed this did not hit the patchwork. resending.
Please consider these for the next fido update.
The following changes since commit 9845a542a76156adb5aef6fd33ad5bc5777acf64:
openssh: CVE-2016-077x (2016-01-20 17:08:30 +)
are available in the git repository at:
git://git.yoctoproject.
