On 03/07/2013 05:06 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 7:38 PM, wrote:
>> From: Tom Zanussi
>>
>> With the 3.8 kernel update, we need a new perf recipe to match. Well,
>> not really, because there's nothing 3.4-specific about the current one,
>> and there's nothing tying it t
On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 7:38 PM, wrote:
> From: Tom Zanussi
>
> With the 3.8 kernel update, we need a new perf recipe to match. Well,
> not really, because there's nothing 3.4-specific about the current one,
> and there's nothing tying it to a specific version of the kernel.
>
> This acknowledg
From: Tom Zanussi
With the 3.8 kernel update, we need a new perf recipe to match. Well,
not really, because there's nothing 3.4-specific about the current one,
and there's nothing tying it to a specific version of the kernel.
This acknowledges that by getting rid fo the version number. It als