[OE-core] [PATCH 0/2] This patch series has two goals.

2025-02-06 Thread Weisser, Pascal.ext via lists.openembedded.org
First, it sets a weak default value for IMAGE_ROOTFS_MAXSIZE. This helps the recipe linter oelint-adv from meta-sca to be aware of the existence of this variable. See https://github.com/priv-kweihmann/oelint-adv/issues/695 for details. Note: The chosen weak default value actually imposes no limit

[OE-core] [PATCH 0/2] This patch series has two goals.

2025-02-06 Thread Weisser, Pascal.ext via lists.openembedded.org
First, it sets a weak default value for IMAGE_ROOTFS_MAXSIZE. This helps the recipe linter oelint-adv from meta-sca to be aware of the existence of this variable. See https://github.com/priv-kweihmann/oelint-adv/issues/695 for details. Note: The chosen weak default value actually imposes no limit

[OE-core] [PATCH 0/2] This patch series improves the kernel-fitimage.bbclass.

2025-02-06 Thread Weisser, Pascal.ext via lists.openembedded.org
First, it takes into account that the initramfs might be built with another multiconfig. Second, an unnecessary dependency is dropped in case the initramfs is already bundled into the kernel. Weisser, Pascal (2): kernel-fitImage: Take possible multiconfig into account. kernel-fitImage: Remove

[OE-core] [PATCH 0/2] uboot-extlinux-config.bbclass: add support for DTBOs

2024-12-19 Thread Quentin Schulz
Currently, Yocto only supports FIT setups in extlinux for providing and applying Device Tree Overlays. It even has an additional requirement of needing the base FDT image node to have a load property outside of the DRAM location where the FIT data is stored. This is being fixed in U-Boot, c.f. http

[OE-core][PATCH 0/2] curl: upgrade 8.10.1 -> 8.11.1

2024-12-11 Thread Peter Marko via lists.openembedded.org
Step-wise upgrade as the first step required the most effort and it was already submitted (skipped due to regressions). Peter Marko (2): curl: upgrade 8.10.1 -> 8.11.0 cure: upgrade 8.11.0 -> 8.11.1 meta/recipes-support/curl/curl/no-test-timeout.patch | 2 +- .../curl/{curl_8.10.1.bb =>

[OE-core] [PATCH 0/2] weston: upgrade and add libdisplay-info recipe

2024-11-20 Thread Hiago De Franco via lists.openembedded.org
From: Hiago De Franco This series aims to upgrade weston from version 13.0.3 to 14.0.1. Since commit a16598b038b2 ("backend-drm: make libdisplay-info mandatory") from Weston, libdisplay-info is now a build dependency, therefore I am also adding libdisplay-info recipe into this series. In order

[OE-core] [PATCH 0/2] Add support for Bluetooth sockets in Python

2024-11-11 Thread Guðni Már Gilbert via lists . openembedded . org
Guðni Már Gilbert (2): bluez5: add PACKAGECONFIG for library python3: add bluez5-native to DEPENDS conditionally meta/recipes-connectivity/bluez5/bluez5.inc| 8 +++- meta/recipes-devtools/python/python3_3.13.0.bb | 3 +++ 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) -- 2.43.0

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 0/2] proposal: Append VENDOR_REVISION to PR for CVE scanners

2024-10-01 Thread Ross Burton
On 20 Sep 2024, at 09:53, Robert Yang via lists.openembedded.org wrote: > The VENDOR_REVISION is for cve scanners to know the CVEs have been fixed in a > lower version, CVE scanners such as Trivy can know the CVEs have been fixed in > a higher version, but it can't know the CVE is fixed in a lowe

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 0/2] proposal: Append VENDOR_REVISION to PR for CVE scanners

2024-09-24 Thread Mikko Rapeli
Hi, On Tue, Sep 24, 2024 at 04:21:49PM +0800, Robert Yang wrote: > On 9/24/24 15:52, Mikko Rapeli wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Fri, Sep 20, 2024 at 01:53:13AM -0700, Robert Yang via > > lists.openembedded.org wrote: > > > From: Robert Yang > > > > > > The VENDOR_REVISION is for cve scanners to kn

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 0/2] proposal: Append VENDOR_REVISION to PR for CVE scanners

2024-09-24 Thread Alexander Kanavin
On Tue, 24 Sept 2024 at 10:18, Robert Yang wrote: > > done by users in local installations? This does appear hack-ish to me, > > the better thing to do would be to actually include the list of fixed > > CVEs into package metadata. > > The problem is that Trivy can't work in this way AFAIK. You do

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 0/2] proposal: Append VENDOR_REVISION to PR for CVE scanners

2024-09-24 Thread Robert Yang via lists.openembedded.org
On 9/24/24 15:52, Mikko Rapeli wrote: Hi, On Fri, Sep 20, 2024 at 01:53:13AM -0700, Robert Yang via lists.openembedded.org wrote: From: Robert Yang The VENDOR_REVISION is for cve scanners to know the CVEs have been fixed in a lower version, CVE scanners such as Trivy can know the CVEs have b

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 0/2] proposal: Append VENDOR_REVISION to PR for CVE scanners

2024-09-24 Thread Robert Yang via lists.openembedded.org
On 9/24/24 12:47, Alexander Kanavin wrote: On Tue, 24 Sept 2024 at 06:24, Robert Yang wrote: Thanks for looking into this, the problem is that the metadata (CVE patch info) is not in the binary packages such as RPMs, so the cve scanners such as Trivy doesn't know that. For example, CentOS and

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 0/2] proposal: Append VENDOR_REVISION to PR for CVE scanners

2024-09-24 Thread Mikko Rapeli
Hi, On Fri, Sep 20, 2024 at 01:53:13AM -0700, Robert Yang via lists.openembedded.org wrote: > From: Robert Yang > > The VENDOR_REVISION is for cve scanners to know the CVEs have been fixed in a > lower version, CVE scanners such as Trivy can know the CVEs have been fixed in > a higher version,

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 0/2] proposal: Append VENDOR_REVISION to PR for CVE scanners

2024-09-23 Thread Alexander Kanavin
On Tue, 24 Sept 2024 at 06:24, Robert Yang wrote: > Thanks for looking into this, the problem is that the metadata (CVE patch > info) > is not in the binary packages such as RPMs, so the cve scanners such as Trivy > doesn't know that. For example, CentOS and Ubuntu also has the similar issues, >

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 0/2] proposal: Append VENDOR_REVISION to PR for CVE scanners

2024-09-23 Thread Robert Yang via lists.openembedded.org
Hi Alexander, On 9/24/24 01:19, Alexander Kanavin wrote: I don't understand. If we fix a CVE with a backport, then there's metadata in the backported patch to indicate that even though the overall version doesn't change to the one that isn't vulnerable, the patch addresses the vulnerability. Why

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 0/2] proposal: Append VENDOR_REVISION to PR for CVE scanners

2024-09-23 Thread Alexander Kanavin
I don't understand. If we fix a CVE with a backport, then there's metadata in the backported patch to indicate that even though the overall version doesn't change to the one that isn't vulnerable, the patch addresses the vulnerability. Why is a whole separate mechanism still needed? Alex On Fri,

[OE-core] [PATCH 0/2] proposal: Append VENDOR_REVISION to PR for CVE scanners

2024-09-20 Thread Robert Yang via lists.openembedded.org
From: Robert Yang The VENDOR_REVISION is for cve scanners to know the CVEs have been fixed in a lower version, CVE scanners such as Trivy can know the CVEs have been fixed in a higher version, but it can't know the CVE is fixed in a lower version without a helper, we have the following ways to se

[OE-core] [PATCH 0/2] oeqa/postactions: save ptests artifacts as archive on host

2024-08-12 Thread Alexis Lothoré via lists . openembedded . org
Hello, on any ptest failure, testimage build a list of artifacts to retrieve from the target under test, create an archive and pull the corresponding raw stream onto the controlling host (eg: autobuilder), which uncompresses it immediately. This small series follows a request to keep those artifac

[OE-core] [PATCH 0/2] SDKs w/ multilibs and spdx30 'isfile'

2024-07-24 Thread Mark Hatle
From: Mark Hatle This resolves problems when building an SDK that includes multilibs. It also adds the isfile change that was previou put in for spdx 2.2. Introduce a new multilib SSTATE_ARCHs, as an optimization this just defaults to SSTATE_ARCHs in most cases. If building an SDK we do expand

[OE-core] [PATCH 0/2] volatile-binds: Mitigate workdir cleanup issues

2024-07-17 Thread Mark Jonas via lists.openembedded.org
From: Ricardo Simoes The recipe `volatile-binds` relies on the `mount-copybind` script to create volatile mount points. In commit [1], the script was modified to use OverlayFS as the primary mount strategy. If OverlayFS fails, it falls back to an old-school bind mount. To meet the requirements o

[OE-core] [PATCH 0/2] Fix SPDX processing with AMD toolchain building

2024-07-15 Thread Mark Hatle
AMD (Xilinx) toolchain building for our 'vitis' product line seems to trigger two issues with the SPDX processing. Specifically: *) Baremetal toolchain elements may have directories listed in them, which triggers a hashing failure *) The toolchains are built of multilib packages, which trigge

Re: [OE-core][PATCH 0/2] Update to latest version of SPDX licenses

2024-07-08 Thread Martin Jansa
Doesn't this cause: ERROR: hdparm-9.65-r0 do_populate_lic: QA Issue: hdparm: hdparm is a generic license, please don't use NO_GENERIC_LICENSE for it. [license-no-generic] ? On Mon, Jul 1, 2024 at 4:33 PM Joshua Watt via lists.openembedded.org wrote: > > Ah, right, I should have known that would h

[OE-core] [PATCH 0/2] oeqa/utils/postactions: fix disk storage consumption

2024-07-05 Thread Alexis Lothoré via lists . openembedded . org
Hello, this small series aims to fix Bugzilla issue 15536 [1], which results in a big disk storage consumption and/or inode max count issue. The main root cause is that in its current form, the artifacts retriever convert symlinks to the targeted files. This series changes the way those files are r

Re: [OE-core][PATCH 0/2] Update to latest version of SPDX licenses

2024-07-01 Thread Joshua Watt
Ah, right, I should have known that would happen. I'll send the fix On Mon, Jul 1, 2024 at 12:56 AM Richard Purdie wrote: > > On Thu, 2024-06-27 at 16:16 -0600, Joshua Watt via lists.openembedded.org > wrote: > > Adds a script to read the released SPDX license JSON data, and uses it > > to updat

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 0/2] Pulseaudio Y2038 fix

2024-07-01 Thread Alexander Kanavin
Thanks, these look good. Alex On Mon, 1 Jul 2024 at 07:56, Primoz Fiser via lists.openembedded.org wrote: > > Hi, > > these 2 patches fix pulseaudio issues with Y2038 compatibility. And in > turn solve run-time issue with "Stack smashing" as described here [1]. > > Explanation: > > Patch #1: Add

Re: [OE-core][PATCH 0/2] Update to latest version of SPDX licenses

2024-06-30 Thread Richard Purdie
On Thu, 2024-06-27 at 16:16 -0600, Joshua Watt via lists.openembedded.org wrote: > Adds a script to read the released SPDX license JSON data, and uses it > to update the common license files > > Joshua Watt (2): >   scripts/pull-spdx-licenses.py: Add script >   licenses: Update to SPDX license ver

[OE-core] [PATCH 0/2] Pulseaudio Y2038 fix

2024-06-30 Thread Primoz Fiser
Hi, these 2 patches fix pulseaudio issues with Y2038 compatibility. And in turn solve run-time issue with "Stack smashing" as described here [1]. Explanation: Patch #1: Adds PACKAGECONFIG[oss-output] and hence adds configure flag "-Doss-output=disabled" by default to pulseaudio. This in turn dis

[OE-core][PATCH 0/2] Update to latest version of SPDX licenses

2024-06-27 Thread Joshua Watt
Adds a script to read the released SPDX license JSON data, and uses it to update the common license files Joshua Watt (2): scripts/pull-spdx-licenses.py: Add script licenses: Update to SPDX license version 3.24.0 meta/files/common-licenses/3D-Slicer-1.0 | 190 + meta/files/common-lice

[OE-core] [PATCH 0/2] ccache: 4.9.1 -> 4.10

2024-06-11 Thread Robert Yang via lists.openembedded.org
From: Robert Yang The fmt is from meta-oe, will send a patch to remove it from meta-oe after this patch is merged. // Robert The following changes since commit 07b4c7a2bd23f8645810e13439e814caaaf9cd94: linuxloader: add -armhf on arm only for TARGET_FPU 'hard' (2024-06-11 11:41:09 +0100) ar

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 0/2] Clear remaining ${PYTHON_PN} uses

2024-04-11 Thread Tim Orling
On Thu, Apr 11, 2024 at 12:47 PM Justin Bronder wrote: > Removing a couple of remaining ${PYTHON_PN} uses that were missed in the > prior scrubs. > Thank you. I thought we had already caught everything. We really do not need to be carrying such obfuscation and abstraction anymore. Let python2 go

[OE-core] [PATCH 0/2] Clear remaining ${PYTHON_PN} uses

2024-04-11 Thread Justin Bronder
Removing a couple of remaining ${PYTHON_PN} uses that were missed in the prior scrubs. -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#198143): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/198143 Mute This Topic: https://lists.openem

[OE-core] [PATCH 0/2] acpica: switch to github and update version

2024-04-03 Thread Jon Mason
While going down the rabbit hole of UPSTREAM_CHECK, I came across this package needing updates. I found the switch to github on the webpage and updated, etc. With the first patch, I get: acpica2023062820240322Ross Burton 170fc3076a86777077637f10b05c32ac21ac13

[OE-core] [PATCH 0/2] *** SUBJECT HERE ***

2024-03-29 Thread lixiaoyong
*** BLURB HERE *** lixiaoyong (2): utils.bbclass: enhance readelf command call with llvm oe/package.py: enhance objdump command call with llvm meta/classes-global/utils.bbclass | 4 ++-- meta/lib/oe/package.py| 2 +- 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) -- 2.34.1

[OE-core] [PATCH 0/2] Move liberror-perl to meta-perl

2024-03-28 Thread Tim Orling
This perl package has not seen any updates since 2020. The upstream author of Error has deprecated it for quite some time. https://metacpan.org/pod/Error#WARNING 'Using the "Error" module is no longer recommended due to the black-magical nature of its syntactic sugar, which often tends

[OE-core] [PATCH 0/2] devtool: ide: define compilerPath instead of using absolute paths for meson

2024-02-22 Thread Enguerrand de Ribaucourt
A feature in vscode-cpptools was just added that allow us to pass the absolute compiler path through the devtool ide-sdk generated configuration. We can revert the meson.bbclass modification to avoid any potential issues with using absolute paths in meson.cross. -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: Yo

[OE-core] [PATCH 0/2] Fix for python3-pytest 8.0.0 related failure

2024-02-16 Thread Tim Orling
The python3-pytest upgrade to 8.0.0 caused a failure in python3-attrs. https://github.com/python-attrs/attrs/issues/1233 Tim Orling (1): python3-attrs: skip test failing with pytest-8 Wang Mingyu (1): python3-pytest: upgrade 7.4.4 -> 8.0.0 ...funcs-skip-test_unknown-for-pytest-8.patch | 30

[OE-Core][PATCH 0/2] testimage: enable artifacts retrieval for failed tests

2024-01-24 Thread Alexis Lothoré via lists . openembedded . org
Hello, this small series is a very late follow-up to my initial artifacts retrieval series (sorry for the delay). The initial series can be found in [1]. The goal is to retrieve some specific files from target whenever some tests fail, to ease debugging. The feature relies on a new TESTIMAGE_FAILED

[OE-core] [PATCH 0/2] meta: Upgrade gettext and nfs-utils

2023-12-04 Thread Robert Yang via lists.openembedded.org
From: Robert Yang The following changes since commit d2c4e8cb85c6a5ca37c7990f879c3b650df5770b: vte: Separate out gtk4 pieces of vte into individual packages (2023-12-04 12:45:20 +) are available in the Git repository at: https://github.com/robertlinux/yocto rbt/upgrade https://githu

[OE-core] [PATCH 0/2] Upgrade gnu-config and gettext

2023-11-27 Thread Robert Yang via lists.openembedded.org
The following changes since commit 212affe748e2f628ecf11f26485b07dd303fe6e3: Revert "binutils: Fix CVE-2022-47007" (2023-11-23 14:58:06 +) are available in the Git repository at: https://github.com/robertlinux/yocto rbt/upgrade https://github.com/robertlinux/yocto/tree/rbt/upgrade Rob

[OE-core] [PATCH 0/2] cmake-qemu

2023-11-20 Thread Adrian Freihofer
Not sure if there is a better way to enable the cmake-qemu.bbclass for all recipes inheriting also the cmake.bbclass globaly. Adrian Freihofer (2): cmake-qemu.bbclass: support qemu for cmake cmake.bbclass: optionally support qemu meta/classes-recipe/cmake-qemu.bbclass | 28 ++

[OE-Core][PATCH 0/2] patch: reduce changes during patch refresh

2023-11-13 Thread Lukas Funke
From: Lukas Funke The patch series aims to reduce the noise in patches created by devtools. Some diffs are just introduced due to an update in the hash or in the diffstats. These changes are not important to a reviewer. Stefan Herbrechtsmeier (2): patch: extract patches without diffstats pat

Re: [OE-Core][PATCH 0/2] Add a display limit for regression report generation

2023-10-19 Thread Alexis Lothoré via lists . openembedded . org
Hello Alexandre, On 10/20/23 08:05, Alexandre Belloni via lists.openembedded.org wrote: > Hello Alexis,> > https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/typhoon/#/builders/80/builds/5886/steps/14/logs/stdio > https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/typhoon/#/builders/79/builds/5935/steps/14/logs/stdio > http

Re: [OE-Core][PATCH 0/2] Add a display limit for regression report generation

2023-10-19 Thread Alexandre Belloni via lists.openembedded.org
Hello Alexis, On 19/10/2023 11:53:50+0200, Alexis Lothoré via lists.openembedded.org wrote: > It has been observed that useful information in regression report can be > drowned in huge regression lists which are often false-positives (for > example, a whole set of tests has been temporarily disabl

[OE-core][PATCH 0/2] DNS resolution using systemd-resolved

2023-10-19 Thread Eero Aaltonen via lists.openembedded.org
From: Eero Aaltonen Enable DNS resolution features from systemd-resolved, such as Multicast DNS for distros using systemd. The first commit enables systemd-resolved via glibc nsswitch.conf, which is one of the interfaces recommended by systemd upstream. The second commit enables mDNS resolutio

[OE-Core][PATCH 0/2] Add a display limit for regression report generation

2023-10-19 Thread Alexis Lothoré via lists . openembedded . org
It has been observed that useful information in regression report can be drowned in huge regression lists which are often false-positives (for example, a whole set of tests has been temporarily disabled). This series brings a default limit to how many changes are displayed per base/target comparis

Re: [OE-Core][PATCH 0/2] Fix regression reporting for master-next

2023-10-11 Thread Alexis Lothoré via lists . openembedded . org
On 10/10/23 11:30, Alexis Lothoré via lists.openembedded.org wrote: > With those two patches, I have been able to properly generate the > regression report from [1] with the following command: It looks like I forgot to paste the relevant command. Here it is, for documentation purpose: yocto_testre

[OE-Core][PATCH 0/2] Fix regression reporting for master-next

2023-10-10 Thread Alexis Lothoré via lists . openembedded . org
There are still issues in Autobuilder when trying to generate regression reports on master-next branch, as visible in [1]. This issue makes build status as failed After being finally able to replicate the issue locally (which is quite difficult since master-next is a force-pushed branch), I observ

[OE-core] [PATCH 0/2] Empty packages and bogus dependencies (Part 1)

2023-09-28 Thread Yoann Congal
This is the first step toward better handling of empty packages and bogus dependencies (e.g. ${PN}-dev -> ${PN}, ${PN}, being empty). See: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-architecture/message/1701 > a) Add warnings for dependencies (RDEPENDS or RRECOMMENDS) on packages > which don't

[OE-core] [PATCH 0/2] Fix musl patches for 254.4

2023-09-25 Thread Khem Raj
Drop the backports Fix patch-fuzz Khem Raj (2): systemd: Drop two upstreamed musl patches systemd: Refresh patches to avoid patch-fuzz ...14-Use-uintmax_t-for-handling-rlim_t.patch | 23 ++--- ...-not-disable-buffer-in-writing-files.patch | 89 + .../0022-Handle-__cpu_mask-us

[OE-core] [PATCH 0/2] Ensure sdk.py knows about nativesdk-intercepts

2023-09-14 Thread Eilís 'pidge' Ní Fhlannagáin
This patch series ensures that do_populate_sdk knows about nativesdk-intercepts. It also ensures that debian builds work with update_mandb. Eilís 'pidge' Ní Fhlannagáin (2): lib/oe/package_managegment: Add nativesdk-intercept PATH update_mandb: deb fails due to missing man cache meta/lib/oe/

[OE-core] [PATCH 0/2] python3-jsonschema: Fix rfc3339 validation dependencies in #kirkstone

2023-09-13 Thread Stephan Wurm via lists.openembedded.org
The project changed its dependency for rfc3339 validation from package "python3-strict-rfc3339" to package "python3-rfc3339-validation" after v3.2.0. But the v4.4.0 recipe in #kirkstone does not reflect this change and still depends on package "python3-strict-rfc3339" when "format" is set in PACKAG

[OE-core] [PATCH 0/2] Fix nativesdk-intercepts for chown/chgrp

2023-09-07 Thread Eilís 'pidge' Ní Fhlannagáin
This set of patches started out with fixing #15023 where building the sdk with api-documentation set would fail out. This patch series fixes both of the main underlying issues. First, populate_sdk did not the nativesdk chown/chgrp intercepts in $PATH. The second issue was within the chown/chgrp

Re: [OE-core][PATCH 0/2] Upgrading Cython to 3.0.0

2023-08-23 Thread Trevor Gamblin
On 2023-08-23 12:08, Khem Raj wrote: On Wed, Aug 23, 2023 at 12:27 AM Luca Ceresoli wrote: On Wed, 23 Aug 2023 09:24:42 +0200 "Luca Ceresoli via lists.openembedded.org" wrote: Hello Trevor, On Mon, 21 Aug 2023 13:38:38 -0400 "Trevor Gamblin" wrote: The Cython 3.0.0 release contains many

Re: [OE-core][PATCH 0/2] Upgrading Cython to 3.0.0

2023-08-23 Thread Khem Raj
On Wed, Aug 23, 2023 at 12:27 AM Luca Ceresoli wrote: > > On Wed, 23 Aug 2023 09:24:42 +0200 > "Luca Ceresoli via lists.openembedded.org" > wrote: > > > Hello Trevor, > > > > On Mon, 21 Aug 2023 13:38:38 -0400 > > "Trevor Gamblin" wrote: > > > > > The Cython 3.0.0 release contains many changes.

[OE-Core][PATCH 0/2] oeqa/utils/gitarchive: put back local tags listing as third tag listing method

2023-08-23 Thread Alexis Lothoré via lists . openembedded . org
Hello, this is another attempt to properly fix tag computation in Autobuilder. First attempt ([1]) completely replaced "git tag" with "git ls-remote" to make sure to know about all tags when computing new tag name. It raised some issue because oe-git-archive works with local repositories with no r

Re: [OE-core][PATCH 0/2] Upgrading Cython to 3.0.0

2023-08-23 Thread Luca Ceresoli via lists.openembedded.org
On Wed, 23 Aug 2023 09:24:42 +0200 "Luca Ceresoli via lists.openembedded.org" wrote: > Hello Trevor, > > On Mon, 21 Aug 2023 13:38:38 -0400 > "Trevor Gamblin" wrote: > > > The Cython 3.0.0 release contains many changes. Since there are a large > > number of recipes that depend on it, there wil

Re: [OE-core][PATCH 0/2] Upgrading Cython to 3.0.0

2023-08-23 Thread Luca Ceresoli via lists.openembedded.org
Hello Trevor, On Mon, 21 Aug 2023 13:38:38 -0400 "Trevor Gamblin" wrote: > The Cython 3.0.0 release contains many changes. Since there are a large > number of recipes that depend on it, there will potentially be build > issues with recipes in meta-python and elsewhere. I performed a world > buil

[OE-core][PATCH 0/2] Upgrading Cython to 3.0.0

2023-08-21 Thread Trevor Gamblin
The Cython 3.0.0 release contains many changes. Since there are a large number of recipes that depend on it, there will potentially be build issues with recipes in meta-python and elsewhere. I performed a world build on poky alone with the python3-cython upgrade and the only recipe to fail was pyth

[OE-Core][PATCH 0/2] oeqa/utils/gitarchive: fix tag name computation

2023-08-11 Thread Alexis Lothoré via lists . openembedded . org
Hello, this series brings a fix to a sporadic tag push issue observed in autobuilder. The bug is documented in bugzilla #15140 ([1]). Basically, whenever the autobuilder creates a new tag on test results, it is only aware of "local" tags, which is kind of faulty since used repository is a shallow c

[OE-Core][PATCH 0/2] add custom string when regression is about missing test result

2023-08-02 Thread Alexis Lothoré via lists . openembedded . org
From: Alexis Lothoré Hello, this very small series intend to eliminate confusion about regressions reported by resulttool whenever a test result is present in "base test result" but absent from "target test result". This scenario leads to many "XXX -> None" lines. The series allows to define cust

Re: [OE-core][PATCH 0/2] Fix: allow specification of dtb directory

2023-05-12 Thread Randolph Sapp via lists.openembedded.org
On 5/12/23 10:06, Alexandre Belloni wrote: Hello, This caused the following failures on the AB: https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/typhoon/#/builders/113/builds/3986/steps/13/logs/stdio https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/typhoon/#/builders/79/builds/5176/steps/15/logs/stdio https://autobuil

Re: [OE-core][PATCH 0/2] Fix: allow specification of dtb directory

2023-05-12 Thread Alexandre Belloni via lists.openembedded.org
Hello, This caused the following failures on the AB: https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/typhoon/#/builders/113/builds/3986/steps/13/logs/stdio https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/typhoon/#/builders/79/builds/5176/steps/15/logs/stdio https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/typhoon/#/builders/86/bu

[OE-core][PATCH 0/2] Fix: allow specification of dtb directory

2023-05-11 Thread Randolph Sapp via lists.openembedded.org
From: Randolph Sapp Fix a few of the oddities introduced by the previous patch that allowed specification of the DTB install directory and specification of vendor directories in that directory. Add a recursive search for dtb and dtbo files to make sure upstream dtb directory standards don't brea

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 0/2] kernel-fitimage/uboot-sign: support 64bits address

2023-05-04 Thread Richard Purdie
On Thu, 2023-04-13 at 18:31 +0800, Jamin Lin wrote: > v1: > kernel-fitimage.bbclass: allow users to change address-cells > to support 64bits address > uboot-sign.bbclass: allow users to change address-cells > to support 64bits address. > > Jamin Lin (2): > kernel-fitimage: support 64 bits addres

[OE-core] [PATCH 0/2] kernel-fitimage/uboot-sign: support 64bits address

2023-04-13 Thread Jamin Lin
v1: kernel-fitimage.bbclass: allow users to change address-cells to support 64bits address uboot-sign.bbclass: allow users to change address-cells to support 64bits address. Jamin Lin (2): kernel-fitimage: support 64 bits address uboot-sign: support 64bits address meta/classes-recipe/kernel-

[OE-core] [PATCH 0/2] kernel-fitimage/uboot-sign: support 64bits address

2023-04-13 Thread Jamin Lin
v1: kernel-fitimage.bbclass: allow users to change address-cells to support 64bits address uboot-sign.bbclass: allow users to change address-cells to support 64bits address. Jamin Lin (2): kernel-fitimage: support 64 bits address uboot-sign: support 64bits address meta/classes-recipe/kernel-

[OE-core] [PATCH 0/2] scripts: yocto_testresults_query fixes and resulttool missing tests

2023-02-27 Thread Alexis Lothoré via lists . openembedded . org
From: Alexis Lothoré Hello, this series is a small follow-up to [1] - add explicit error when running yocto_testresults_query.py from oe-core instead of poky. Since the tool is working with git references from poky, it will not manage to resolve SHA-1 in oe-core - add tests for new resulttoo

[OE-core][PATCH 0/2] Remove unnecessary SPDX files from deploydir

2023-02-09 Thread Joshua Watt
Per feedback from users, remove the top level image SPDX file and the JSON index file from DEPLOYDIR. Having these files here is confusing to end users because these files are not very useful by themselves, and having them in DEPLOYDIR makes it unclear which they should be using. Joshua Watt (2):

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 0/2] kernel-yocto: drop 5.19 recipes and make 6.1 default

2023-01-26 Thread Khem Raj
On Thu, Jan 26, 2023 at 10:06 AM Bruce Ashfield wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 26, 2023 at 12:58 PM Khem Raj wrote: > > > > we need to define > > > > KBUILD_BUILD_USER="yocto" > > KBUILD_BUILD_HOST="yocto" > > > > in linux-yocto defconfigs > > > > No, we really don't want to do that. > > There's an envir

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 0/2] kernel-yocto: drop 5.19 recipes and make 6.1 default

2023-01-26 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On Thu, Jan 26, 2023 at 12:58 PM Khem Raj wrote: > > we need to define > > KBUILD_BUILD_USER="yocto" > KBUILD_BUILD_HOST="yocto" > > in linux-yocto defconfigs > No, we really don't want to do that. There's an environment variable that is supposed to be reflected in the build. Which we already se

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 0/2] kernel-yocto: drop 5.19 recipes and make 6.1 default

2023-01-26 Thread Khem Raj
we need to define KBUILD_BUILD_USER="yocto" KBUILD_BUILD_HOST="yocto" in linux-yocto defconfigs You can use my name too :) On Thu, Jan 26, 2023 at 9:34 AM Richard Purdie wrote: > > On Thu, 2023-01-26 at 12:07 -0500, Bruce Ashfield wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 26, 2023 at 11:36 AM Richard Purdie > >

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 0/2] kernel-yocto: drop 5.19 recipes and make 6.1 default

2023-01-26 Thread Richard Purdie
On Thu, 2023-01-26 at 12:07 -0500, Bruce Ashfield wrote: > On Thu, Jan 26, 2023 at 11:36 AM Richard Purdie > wrote: > > > > On Thu, 2023-01-26 at 17:21 +0100, Alexandre Belloni wrote: > > > On 26/01/2023 12:39:02+, Richard Purdie wrote: > > > > On Tue, 2023-01-24 at 16:59 -0500, bruce.ashfi..

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 0/2] kernel-yocto: drop 5.19 recipes and make 6.1 default

2023-01-26 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On Thu, Jan 26, 2023 at 11:36 AM Richard Purdie wrote: > > On Thu, 2023-01-26 at 17:21 +0100, Alexandre Belloni wrote: > > On 26/01/2023 12:39:02+, Richard Purdie wrote: > > > On Tue, 2023-01-24 at 16:59 -0500, bruce.ashfi...@gmail.com wrote: > > > > From: Bruce Ashfield > > > > > > > > Richa

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 0/2] kernel-yocto: drop 5.19 recipes and make 6.1 default

2023-01-26 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On Thu, Jan 26, 2023 at 11:36 AM Richard Purdie wrote: > > On Thu, 2023-01-26 at 17:21 +0100, Alexandre Belloni wrote: > > On 26/01/2023 12:39:02+, Richard Purdie wrote: > > > On Tue, 2023-01-24 at 16:59 -0500, bruce.ashfi...@gmail.com wrote: > > > > From: Bruce Ashfield > > > > > > > > Richa

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 0/2] kernel-yocto: drop 5.19 recipes and make 6.1 default

2023-01-26 Thread Richard Purdie
On Thu, 2023-01-26 at 17:21 +0100, Alexandre Belloni wrote: > On 26/01/2023 12:39:02+, Richard Purdie wrote: > > On Tue, 2023-01-24 at 16:59 -0500, bruce.ashfi...@gmail.com wrote: > > > From: Bruce Ashfield > > > > > > Richard, > > > > > > As promised, here are the commits to switch us over

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 0/2] kernel-yocto: drop 5.19 recipes and make 6.1 default

2023-01-26 Thread Alexandre Belloni via lists.openembedded.org
On 26/01/2023 12:39:02+, Richard Purdie wrote: > On Tue, 2023-01-24 at 16:59 -0500, bruce.ashfi...@gmail.com wrote: > > From: Bruce Ashfield > > > > Richard, > > > > As promised, here are the commits to switch us over to 6.1 as the > > default. > > > > I'll also send a series for poky to bu

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 0/2] kernel-yocto: drop 5.19 recipes and make 6.1 default

2023-01-26 Thread Richard Purdie
On Tue, 2023-01-24 at 16:59 -0500, bruce.ashfi...@gmail.com wrote: > From: Bruce Ashfield > > Richard, > > As promised, here are the commits to switch us over to 6.1 as the > default. > > I'll also send a series for poky to bump things there as well. > > Also, if there are any significant prob

[OE-core] [PATCH 0/2] kernel-yocto: drop 5.19 recipes and make 6.1 default

2023-01-24 Thread Bruce Ashfield
From: Bruce Ashfield Richard, As promised, here are the commits to switch us over to 6.1 as the default. I'll also send a series for poky to bump things there as well. Also, if there are any significant problems, we'll just shelve this while I look at any issues. But at this point, it is worth

Re: [OE-core][PATCH 0/2] wic/plugins/images/direct: replace fstab entries

2023-01-06 Thread Florian Bezdeka
On 05.01.23 14:22, Henning Schild via lists.openembedded.org wrote: > Am Thu, 5 Jan 2023 12:52:21 + > schrieb Felix Moessbauer : > >> For comparison, here the fstab files for the ext4 and the wic version >> of the core-image-minimal (see below). > > In fact one probably really wants no fstab

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 0/2] Load proper sound drivers for QEMU x86

2023-01-05 Thread Mark Jonas
Hi Richard, On Wed, Jan 4, 2023 at 6:42 PM Richard Purdie wrote: > > On Wed, 2023-01-04 at 13:18 +0100, toer...@gmail.com wrote: > > From: Mark Jonas > > > > The patch series fixes a regression where images built for QEMU x86 and > > x86-64 did not contain sound drivers matching the QEMU device

Re: [OE-core][PATCH 0/2] wic/plugins/images/direct: replace fstab entries

2023-01-05 Thread Henning Schild
Am Thu, 5 Jan 2023 12:52:21 + schrieb Felix Moessbauer : > For comparison, here the fstab files for the ext4 and the wic version > of the core-image-minimal (see below). In fact one probably really wants no fstab / line at all, unless it is ever somehow explicitly asked for. The bootloader a

[OE-core][PATCH 0/2] wic/plugins/images/direct: replace fstab entries

2023-01-05 Thread Felix Moessbauer
For comparison, here the fstab files for the ext4 and the wic version of the core-image-minimal (see below). Putting all persons in CC who have been involved in the first try and in the revert. Best regards, Felix Moessbauer Siemens AG .ext4 ``` # stock fstab - you probably want to override this

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 0/2] Load proper sound drivers for QEMU x86

2023-01-04 Thread Richard Purdie
On Wed, 2023-01-04 at 13:18 +0100, toer...@gmail.com wrote: > From: Mark Jonas > > The patch series fixes a regression where images built for QEMU x86 and > x86-64 did not contain sound drivers matching the QEMU device emulation > configuration. Additionally, the right drivers are now also auto-l

[OE-core] [PATCH 0/2] Load proper sound drivers for QEMU x86

2023-01-04 Thread Mark Jonas
From: Mark Jonas The patch series fixes a regression where images built for QEMU x86 and x86-64 did not contain sound drivers matching the QEMU device emulation configuration. Additionally, the right drivers are now also auto-loaded when starting the image. root@qemux86:~# uname -a Linux qemux86

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 0/2] image specific configuration with oeqa runtime tests

2022-11-18 Thread Richard Purdie
On Fri, 2022-11-18 at 17:57 +0200, Mikko Rapeli wrote: > On Fri, Nov 18, 2022 at 03:04:29PM +, Richard Purdie wrote: > > > My concern is having multiple different file formats and data streams. > > It means we no longer have one definitive data mechanism but two, then > > the argument for peop

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 0/2] image specific configuration with oeqa runtime tests

2022-11-18 Thread Mikko Rapeli
Hi, On Fri, Nov 18, 2022 at 04:04:01PM +, Richard Purdie wrote: > On Fri, 2022-11-18 at 17:57 +0200, Mikko Rapeli wrote: > > Additionally I'm currently interested in kirkstone LTS branch so would like > > any changes to be there too... > > The idea is that we develop things in master, then th

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 0/2] image specific configuration with oeqa runtime tests

2022-11-18 Thread Richard Purdie
On Fri, 2022-11-18 at 17:57 +0200, Mikko Rapeli wrote: > Additionally I'm currently interested in kirkstone LTS branch so would like > any changes to be there too... The idea is that we develop things in master, then they become available in the next LTS release, not the previous one. People some

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 0/2] image specific configuration with oeqa runtime tests

2022-11-18 Thread Mikko Rapeli
On Fri, Nov 18, 2022 at 03:04:29PM +, Richard Purdie wrote: > On Fri, 2022-11-18 at 16:32 +0200, Mikko Rapeli wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Thu, Nov 17, 2022 at 04:57:36PM +, Richard Purdie wrote: > > > On Thu, 2022-11-17 at 17:39 +0200, Mikko Rapeli wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > On Thu,

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 0/2] image specific configuration with oeqa runtime tests

2022-11-18 Thread Richard Purdie
On Fri, 2022-11-18 at 16:32 +0200, Mikko Rapeli wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, Nov 17, 2022 at 04:57:36PM +, Richard Purdie wrote: > > On Thu, 2022-11-17 at 17:39 +0200, Mikko Rapeli wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > On Thu, Nov 17, 2022 at 03:17:43PM +, Richard Purdie wrote: > > > > On Thu, 2022-11

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 0/2] image specific configuration with oeqa runtime tests

2022-11-18 Thread Mikko Rapeli
Hi, On Thu, Nov 17, 2022 at 04:57:36PM +, Richard Purdie wrote: > On Thu, 2022-11-17 at 17:39 +0200, Mikko Rapeli wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Thu, Nov 17, 2022 at 03:17:43PM +, Richard Purdie wrote: > > > On Thu, 2022-11-17 at 09:12 +0200, Mikko Rapeli wrote: > > > > Many runtime tests woul

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 0/2] image specific configuration with oeqa runtime tests

2022-11-17 Thread Richard Purdie
On Thu, 2022-11-17 at 17:39 +0200, Mikko Rapeli wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, Nov 17, 2022 at 03:17:43PM +, Richard Purdie wrote: > > On Thu, 2022-11-17 at 09:12 +0200, Mikko Rapeli wrote: > > > Many runtime tests would need customization for different > > > machines and images. Currently some test

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 0/2] image specific configuration with oeqa runtime tests

2022-11-17 Thread Mikko Rapeli
Hi, On Thu, Nov 17, 2022 at 03:17:43PM +, Richard Purdie wrote: > On Thu, 2022-11-17 at 09:12 +0200, Mikko Rapeli wrote: > > Many runtime tests would need customization for different > > machines and images. Currently some tests like parselogs.py are hard > > coding machine specific exceptions

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 0/2] image specific configuration with oeqa runtime tests

2022-11-17 Thread Richard Purdie
On Thu, 2022-11-17 at 09:12 +0200, Mikko Rapeli wrote: > Many runtime tests would need customization for different > machines and images. Currently some tests like parselogs.py are hard > coding machine specific exceptions into the test itself. I think these > machine specific exceptions fit better

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 0/2] image specific configuration with oeqa runtime tests

2022-11-17 Thread Mikko Rapeli
Hi, On Thu, Nov 17, 2022 at 03:22:20PM +0100, Alexandre Belloni wrote: > Hello, > > With this two patches, I have multiple new warnings on the autobuilders > for qemuarm and qemuarm-alt > > https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/typhoon/#/builders/53/builds/6185/steps/13/logs/stdio > https://autob

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 0/2] image specific configuration with oeqa runtime tests

2022-11-17 Thread Alexandre Belloni via lists.openembedded.org
Hello, With this two patches, I have multiple new warnings on the autobuilders for qemuarm and qemuarm-alt https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/typhoon/#/builders/53/builds/6185/steps/13/logs/stdio https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/typhoon/#/builders/110/builds/5064/steps/12/logs/stdio On 17/

[OE-core] [PATCH 0/2] image specific configuration with oeqa runtime tests

2022-11-16 Thread Mikko Rapeli
Many runtime tests would need customization for different machines and images. Currently some tests like parselogs.py are hard coding machine specific exceptions into the test itself. I think these machine specific exceptions fit better as image specific ones, since a single machine config can gene

[OE-core] [PATCH 0/2] Support cargo crate fetcher for externalsrc

2022-05-19 Thread Chanho Park via lists.openembedded.org
When we use externalsrc.bbclass with devtool, it is not possible to fetch crates via bb/fetch2/crate.py even though crate:// is defined in SRC_URI. To be working with externalsrc, we should not remove from externalsrc and remove "-z ${EXTERNALSRC}" check from cargo_common.bbclass. Chanho Park (2):

[OE-core] [PATCH 0/2] Some kernel fitimage build fixes

2022-03-28 Thread Ming Liu
From: Ming Liu Ming Liu (2): kernel-fitimage.bbclass: change 'echo' to 'bbnote' kernel-fitimage.bbclass: introduce FIT_SUPPORTED_INITRAMFS_FSTYPES meta/classes/kernel-fitimage.bbclass | 35 +--- 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) -- 2.25.1 -=-=-=-=

[OE-core] [PATCH 0/2] Enable package.bbclass to process kernel packages

2021-12-21 Thread Saul Wold
These changes allow the package bbclass to process the kernel and kernel modules so that they that extended packaging info can be used by the create-spdx bbclass. Tested with qemux86-64 Saul Wold (2): kernel: add -dbg package package.bbclass: don't skip kernel and kernel modules meta/clas

Re: [oe][OE-core][Patch 0/2] implement applying patches from a directory

2021-12-13 Thread Alexander Kanavin
But you can use externalsrc to simply point to a custom source checkout, no? Alex On Mon, 13 Dec 2021 at 18:34, Max Krummenacher wrote: > On Fri, Dec 10, 2021 at 4:57 PM Richard Purdie > wrote: > > > > On Fri, 2021-12-10 at 14:04 +0100, Max Krummenacher wrote: > > > The current developer manua

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >