On 09/18/2012 10:50 PM, Scott Garman wrote:
Hello,
This is a fix for Yocto bug #3112, where there are certain edge cases
where the bitbake command is avalable to fails to run. Previously we
mistakenly treated that as the same case as if bitbake didn't exist in
the user's $PATH, and this fix caus
Hello,
This is a fix for Yocto bug #3112, where there are certain edge cases
where the bitbake command is avalable to fails to run. Previously we
mistakenly treated that as the same case as if bitbake didn't exist in
the user's $PATH, and this fix causes us to show the user the output
of bitbake s
Hello,
This is a fix for Yocto bug #3112, where there are certain edge cases
where the bitbake command is avalable to fails to run. Previously we
mistakenly treated that as the same case as if bitbake didn't exist in
the user's $PATH, and this fix causes us to show the user the output
of bitbake s
On 07/22/2011 06:36 PM, Scott Garman wrote:
This fixes an issue Jessica Zhang reported to me today:
Invoking runqemu outside of the build directory for an
in-tree setup results in an empty TMPDIR because bitbake -e
cannot be run to find it.
A symptom of this problem is running runqemu and getti
This fixes an issue Jessica Zhang reported to me today:
Invoking runqemu outside of the build directory for an
in-tree setup results in an empty TMPDIR because bitbake -e
cannot be run to find it.
A symptom of this problem is running runqemu and getting the
following error:
Error: Unable to