On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 3:19 PM, Andy Ross wrote:
> On 11/28/2012 03:14 PM, Flanagan, Elizabeth wrote:
>>
>> This patch needs a rebase and a minor bit of whitespace work. I've
>> done some work to make it apply to the current master head and tested
>> it out and it does improve the utility of INCO
On 11/28/2012 03:14 PM, Flanagan, Elizabeth wrote:
This patch needs a rebase and a minor bit of whitespace work. I've
done some work to make it apply to the current master head and tested
it out and it does improve the utility of INCOMPATIBLE_LICENSE quite a
bit.
Hm... AFAICT the content of the
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 8:37 AM, Richard Purdie
wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-11-16 at 11:09 -0800, Andy Ross wrote:
>> On 11/01/2012 11:02 AM, Andy Ross wrote:
>> > We hit a problem trying to exclude L/GPLv3 recipes where
>> > INCOMPATIBLE_LICENSE could only match exactly one license. The older
>> > wil
On Fri, 2012-11-16 at 11:09 -0800, Andy Ross wrote:
> On 11/01/2012 11:02 AM, Andy Ross wrote:
> > We hit a problem trying to exclude L/GPLv3 recipes where
> > INCOMPATIBLE_LICENSE could only match exactly one license. The older
> > wildcard syntax had been broken by a more recent SPDX change
> >
On 11/01/2012 11:02 AM, Andy Ross wrote:
We hit a problem trying to exclude L/GPLv3 recipes where
INCOMPATIBLE_LICENSE could only match exactly one license. The older
wildcard syntax had been broken by a more recent SPDX change
(specifying a string without a SPDXLICENSEMAP entry could crash), so
We hit a problem trying to exclude L/GPLv3 recipes where
INCOMPATIBLE_LICENSE could only match exactly one license. The older
wildcard syntax had been broken by a more recent SPDX change
(specifying a string without a SPDXLICENSEMAP entry could crash), so
"*GPLv3" wouldn't work.
This fixes that,
