Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] xz: Correctly specify GPL-3.0 with autoconf exception

> On Aug 31, 2015, at 12:43 PM, Mark Hatle wrote: > > On 8/31/15 2:20 PM, Khem Raj wrote: >> On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 10:51 AM, Mark Hatle >> wrote: >>> >>> The way the recipe 'LICENSE =' field was defined, AFAIK, was that it was the >>> license of the source used to construct the binaries. >>

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] xz: Correctly specify GPL-3.0 with autoconf exception

On 31 August 2015 at 21:18, Christopher Larson wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 12:43 PM, Mark Hatle > wrote: >> >> If that is the way we want to move forward, then my recommendation would >> be to >> add a new field for that. >> >> LICENSE-SRC = "source license list" >> LICENSE = "declared lic

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] xz: Correctly specify GPL-3.0 with autoconf exception

On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 12:43 PM, Mark Hatle wrote: > If that is the way we want to move forward, then my recommendation would > be to > add a new field for that. > > LICENSE-SRC = "source license list" > LICENSE = "declared license for the expected output of the build" > LICENSE_ = "The license

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] xz: Correctly specify GPL-3.0 with autoconf exception

On 8/31/15 2:20 PM, Khem Raj wrote: > On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 10:51 AM, Mark Hatle wrote: >> >> The way the recipe 'LICENSE =' field was defined, AFAIK, was that it was the >> license of the source used to construct the binaries. >> >> So if the autoconf was GPLv3, but the package and it's sources

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] xz: Correctly specify GPL-3.0 with autoconf exception

On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 10:51 AM, Mark Hatle wrote: > > The way the recipe 'LICENSE =' field was defined, AFAIK, was that it was the > license of the source used to construct the binaries. > > So if the autoconf was GPLv3, but the package and it's sources are GPLv2+, it > would be listed as GPLv2+

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] xz: Correctly specify GPL-3.0 with autoconf exception

On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 10:35 AM, Christopher Larson wrote: > I think we need a way to indicate the license of the source in addition to > the license of what we ship, to cover the case where the license affects the > ability to redistribute sources. I'd thought that the base LICENSE was > essenti

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] xz: Correctly specify GPL-3.0 with autoconf exception

On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 11:19 AM, Christopher Larson wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 10:51 AM, Mark Hatle > wrote: >> >> On 8/31/15 12:35 PM, Christopher Larson wrote: >> > >> > On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 10:10 AM, Khem Raj > > > wrote: >> > >> > On Mon, Aug 31, 201

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] xz: Correctly specify GPL-3.0 with autoconf exception

On 8/31/15 1:19 PM, Christopher Larson wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 10:51 AM, Mark Hatle > wrote: > > On 8/31/15 12:35 PM, Christopher Larson wrote: > > > > On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 10:10 AM, Khem Raj > >

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] xz: Correctly specify GPL-3.0 with autoconf exception

On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 10:51 AM, Mark Hatle wrote: > On 8/31/15 12:35 PM, Christopher Larson wrote: > > > > On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 10:10 AM, Khem Raj > > wrote: > > > > On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 10:05 AM, Flanagan, Elizabeth > > mailto:elizabeth.flana...@intel.

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] xz: Correctly specify GPL-3.0 with autoconf exception

On 8/31/15 12:35 PM, Christopher Larson wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 10:10 AM, Khem Raj > wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 10:05 AM, Flanagan, Elizabeth > mailto:elizabeth.flana...@intel.com>> > wrote: > > On 30 August 2015 at 17:31, Khem Raj

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] xz: Correctly specify GPL-3.0 with autoconf exception

On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 10:10 AM, Khem Raj wrote: > On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 10:05 AM, Flanagan, Elizabeth > wrote: > > On 30 August 2015 at 17:31, Khem Raj wrote: > >> There is m4/ax_pthread.m4 macro which uses GPL-3.0 with autoconf > >> exception, there is no other occurance of GPL-3.0 use, le

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] xz: Correctly specify GPL-3.0 with autoconf exception

On 30 August 2015 at 17:31, Khem Raj wrote: > There is m4/ax_pthread.m4 macro which uses GPL-3.0 with autoconf > exception, there is no other occurance of GPL-3.0 use, lets mark the > licence correctly. Unless the macro is actually shipped with any of the packages, I don't think we actually need

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] xz: Correctly specify GPL-3.0 with autoconf exception

On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 10:05 AM, Flanagan, Elizabeth wrote: > On 30 August 2015 at 17:31, Khem Raj wrote: >> There is m4/ax_pthread.m4 macro which uses GPL-3.0 with autoconf >> exception, there is no other occurance of GPL-3.0 use, lets mark the >> licence correctly. > > Unless the macro is actu