On 9/14/12 5:37 PM, Phil Blundell wrote:
On Fri, 2012-09-14 at 17:28 -0500, Mark Hatle wrote:
Based on that, I'm not sure what RREPLACES is being used for:
FILES_${PN} = "${bindir} ${libdir}/X11/Options ${libdir}/X11/Cards
${libdir}/X11/getconfig ${libdir}/X11/etc ${libdir}/modules/*.so
${libdi
On Fri, 2012-09-14 at 17:28 -0500, Mark Hatle wrote:
> Based on that, I'm not sure what RREPLACES is being used for:
>
> FILES_${PN} = "${bindir} ${libdir}/X11/Options ${libdir}/X11/Cards
> ${libdir}/X11/getconfig ${libdir}/X11/etc ${libdir}/modules/*.so
> ${libdir}/xorg/modules/*.so /etc/X11 ${
On 9/14/12 5:16 PM, Phil Blundell wrote:
On Fri, 2012-09-14 at 17:13 -0500, Mark Hatle wrote:
Coming from the RPM world, that behavior is entirely unexpected. There is no
way (by design) for an RPM package to be tagged as being allowed to replace
files of another package.
How would rpm conven
On Fri, 2012-09-14 at 17:13 -0500, Mark Hatle wrote:
> Coming from the RPM world, that behavior is entirely unexpected. There is no
> way (by design) for an RPM package to be tagged as being allowed to replace
> files of another package.
How would rpm conventionally deal with the situation at h
On 9/14/12 5:03 PM, Phil Blundell wrote:
On Fri, 2012-09-14 at 16:56 -0500, Mark Hatle wrote:
On 9/14/12 4:50 PM, Phil Blundell wrote:
On Fri, 2012-09-14 at 18:29 +0100, Paul Eggleton wrote:
Unfortunately with rpm at least, this results in xserver-xorg-module-exa
being installed in preference
On Fri, 2012-09-14 at 16:56 -0500, Mark Hatle wrote:
> On 9/14/12 4:50 PM, Phil Blundell wrote:
> > On Fri, 2012-09-14 at 18:29 +0100, Paul Eggleton wrote:
> >> Unfortunately with rpm at least, this results in xserver-xorg-module-exa
> >> being installed in preference to xserver-xorg when construct
On 9/14/12 4:50 PM, Phil Blundell wrote:
On Fri, 2012-09-14 at 18:29 +0100, Paul Eggleton wrote:
Unfortunately with rpm at least, this results in xserver-xorg-module-exa
being installed in preference to xserver-xorg when constructing the root
filesystem, which is clearly not desirable.
Surely
On Fri, 2012-09-14 at 18:29 +0100, Paul Eggleton wrote:
> Unfortunately with rpm at least, this results in xserver-xorg-module-exa
> being installed in preference to xserver-xorg when constructing the root
> filesystem, which is clearly not desirable.
Surely this is a bug in the rpm packaging back
Unfortunately with rpm at least, this results in xserver-xorg-module-exa
being installed in preference to xserver-xorg when constructing the root
filesystem, which is clearly not desirable.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton
---
.../xorg-xserver/xserver-xorg-1.11.2.inc |2 +-
.../recipes
