On Wed, 2022-06-29 at 17:15 +0200, Alexander Kanavin wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Jun 2022 at 16:10, Richard Purdie
> wrote:
> > I'm not sure it makes a lot of difference. The 5 changes after 9.0 look
> > relatively harmless, some of them are translation fixes. This change
> > addresses 4 CVEs and I suspec
On Wed, 29 Jun 2022 at 16:10, Richard Purdie
wrote:
> I'm not sure it makes a lot of difference. The 5 changes after 9.0 look
> relatively harmless, some of them are translation fixes. This change
> addresses 4 CVEs and I suspect there will be more to follow so we'll
> have to update past 9.0 soon
On Wed, 2022-06-29 at 16:57 +0300, Alexander Kanavin wrote:
> Would it be better to stay at 9.0. for now?
I'm not sure it makes a lot of difference. The 5 changes after 9.0 look
relatively harmless, some of them are translation fixes. This change
addresses 4 CVEs and I suspect there will be mo
Would it be better to stay at 9.0. for now?
Alex
On Wed 29. Jun 2022 at 16.26, Richard Purdie <
richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> The license checksum changed due to a major version change in the
> referenced file.
>
> Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie
> ---
> .../vim/{vim-tiny_8.2.
The license checksum changed due to a major version change in the referenced
file.
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie
---
.../vim/{vim-tiny_8.2.bb => vim-tiny-9.0.bb}| 0
meta/recipes-support/vim/vim.inc| 6 +++---
meta/recipes-support/vim/{vim_8.2.bb => v
