On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 3:31 PM, Carlos Rafael Giani
wrote:
> It is in master, which is nice. But not in fido? Is it too late for fixes
> like these? If so, I'll have to backport this fix into meta-fsl-arm-extra
> for the cubox-i uboot.
> Otherwise, if it is to be reviewed for inclusion into fido,
It is in master, which is nice. But not in fido? Is it too late for
fixes like these? If so, I'll have to backport this fix into
meta-fsl-arm-extra for the cubox-i uboot.
Otherwise, if it is to be reviewed for inclusion into fido, I'm fine
with that.
Am 2015-04-20 um 21:31 schrieb Otavio Salva
On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 09:17:08PM +0200, Carlos Rafael Giani wrote:
> The script does "i == j" checks to retrieve the config <-> type pairs from
> the UBOOT_MACHINE and UBOOT_CONFIG lists. This check however requires both
> j and i to be initially unset. Ensure this by explicitely unsetting i.
>
On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 4:17 PM, Carlos Rafael Giani
wrote:
> The script does "i == j" checks to retrieve the config <-> type pairs from
> the UBOOT_MACHINE and UBOOT_CONFIG lists. This check however requires both
> j and i to be initially unset. Ensure this by explicitely unsetting i.
>
> This fi
The script does "i == j" checks to retrieve the config <-> type pairs from
the UBOOT_MACHINE and UBOOT_CONFIG lists. This check however requires both
j and i to be initially unset. Ensure this by explicitely unsetting i.
This fixes broken u-boot SPL installations with SolidRun machines
(the SPL wa
