On 23 April 2015 at 19:47, Richard Purdie <
richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> This was discussed long ago and there are two different tasks as a
> compromise. testimage_auto runs automatically after a rootfs is built
> and has the correct dependencies. "testimage" is triggered manually.
On Thu, 2015-04-23 at 14:25 +0100, Paul Eggleton wrote:
> On Thursday 23 April 2015 16:02:45 Burton, Ross wrote:
> > On 23 April 2015 at 12:20, Paul Eggleton
> > wrote:
> > > I can't remember for certain, but I suspect the lack of this dependency
> > > was intentional, so that you could e.g. copy
On Thursday 23 April 2015 16:02:45 Burton, Ross wrote:
> On 23 April 2015 at 12:20, Paul Eggleton
> wrote:
> > I can't remember for certain, but I suspect the lack of this dependency
> > was intentional, so that you could e.g. copy in an image built elsewhere
> > and run tests on it. Maybe we can
On 23 April 2015 at 12:20, Paul Eggleton
wrote:
> I can't remember for certain, but I suspect the lack of this dependency was
> intentional, so that you could e.g. copy in an image built elsewhere and
> run
> tests on it. Maybe we can take the decision we don't need that, but it
> should
> be a c
On Thursday 23 April 2015 09:39:08 Cristian Iorga wrote:
> While starting a test with testimage, changes
> of the image under test don't trigger a rebuild,
> so fix that.
>
> Signed-off-by: Cristian Iorga
> ---
> meta/classes/testimage.bbclass | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion
While starting a test with testimage, changes
of the image under test don't trigger a rebuild,
so fix that.
Signed-off-by: Cristian Iorga
---
meta/classes/testimage.bbclass | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/meta/classes/testimage.bbclass b/meta/classes/testimage