On 28 April 2017 at 19:01, Marc Ferland wrote:
> Tested with opkg HEAD revision. I also tested with 0.3.0 but it seems the
> 'compare-versions' command was broken...
>
Thanks for verifying.
Yes, it was. I tried writing a test case for this last year, discovered
that opkg had three commands to
On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 12:30 PM, Burton, Ross
wrote:
>
> On 28 April 2017 at 14:58, Burton, Ross wrote:
>
>> dpkg thinks that 1.2rc2 is less than 1.2.0, I suspect the RRS doesn't use
>> the same algorithm. Not sure what opkg and dpkg think of it.
>>
>
> I meant opkg and rpm, obviously.
>
> Goo
On 28 April 2017 at 14:58, Burton, Ross wrote:
> dpkg thinks that 1.2rc2 is less than 1.2.0, I suspect the RRS doesn't use
> the same algorithm. Not sure what opkg and dpkg think of it.
>
I meant opkg and rpm, obviously.
Good news is that RPM says 1.2rc2 < 1.2.0 too.
Ross
--
On 28 April 2017 at 14:15, Tanu Kaskinen wrote:
> Oh, I'm on speex-dev, and I missed the announcement of the new
> version... The recipe reporting system didn't notice the new version
> either, probably because it thought "1.2.0" is less than "1.2rc2". I
> wonder if this will be a problem for pac
On Thu, 2017-04-27 at 11:39 -0400, Marc Ferland wrote:
> Upgrade speex to 1.2.0. Very small diff between 1.2rc2 and 1.2.0, mostly
> compiler warning fixes, tabs vs spaces, trailing whitespaces and one
> liners.
>
> Signed-off-by: Marc Ferland
> ---
> meta/recipes-multimedia/speex/speex_1.2.0.bb
Upgrade speex to 1.2.0. Very small diff between 1.2rc2 and 1.2.0, mostly
compiler warning fixes, tabs vs spaces, trailing whitespaces and one
liners.
Signed-off-by: Marc Ferland
---
meta/recipes-multimedia/speex/speex_1.2.0.bb | 19 +++
meta/recipes-multimedia/speex/speex_1.2rc2
