Perfect :)
Ross
On 10 November 2017 at 12:13, Radek Dostál wrote:
> Hi Ross,
>
> On 2017-11-10 12:10, Burton, Ross wrote:
> > Are the test applications packaged? If you split the packaging into two
> > packages then you could set the right license per-package.
>
> thank you for your feedback.
Hi Ross,
On 2017-11-10 12:10, Burton, Ross wrote:
> Are the test applications packaged? If you split the packaging into two
> packages then you could set the right license per-package.
thank you for your feedback. I moved examples to their own package and
configured licenses individually. Please
On 10 November 2017 at 11:02, Radek Dostál wrote:
> sbc library itself is licensed under LGPLv2.1 or higher as mentioned in
> sbc/sbc.h or any other file in sbc directory.
>
> sbc test applications are licensed under GPLv2 or higher as mentioned in
> src/sbcenc.c or any other file in src director
sbc library itself is licensed under LGPLv2.1 or higher as mentioned in
sbc/sbc.h or any other file in sbc directory.
sbc test applications are licensed under GPLv2 or higher as mentioned in
src/sbcenc.c or any other file in src directory
Reported-by: Vladimir Koutny
Signed-off-by: Radek Dostál
