On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 07:31:40AM -0700, akuster808 wrote:
>
>
> On 08/21/2015 05:06 AM, Martin Jansa wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 11:48:30AM +0300, Jussi Kukkonen wrote:
> >> On 18 August 2015 at 11:03, Martin Jansa wrote:
> >>> On Sun, Aug 09, 2015 at 10:58:21AM +0530, Armin Kuster wrot
On 08/21/2015 05:06 AM, Martin Jansa wrote:
On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 11:48:30AM +0300, Jussi Kukkonen wrote:
On 18 August 2015 at 11:03, Martin Jansa wrote:
On Sun, Aug 09, 2015 at 10:58:21AM +0530, Armin Kuster wrote:
adding the license definitions on the few packages that
deviate from the
On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 11:48:30AM +0300, Jussi Kukkonen wrote:
> On 18 August 2015 at 11:03, Martin Jansa wrote:
> > On Sun, Aug 09, 2015 at 10:58:21AM +0530, Armin Kuster wrote:
> >> adding the license definitions on the few packages that
> >> deviate from the overall package license.
> >>
> >>
On 18 August 2015 at 11:03, Martin Jansa wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 09, 2015 at 10:58:21AM +0530, Armin Kuster wrote:
>> adding the license definitions on the few packages that
>> deviate from the overall package license.
>>
>> based on http://www.lysator.liu.se/~nisse/nettle/nettle.html#Copyright
>> an
On Sun, Aug 09, 2015 at 10:58:21AM +0530, Armin Kuster wrote:
> adding the license definitions on the few packages that
> deviate from the overall package license.
>
> based on http://www.lysator.liu.se/~nisse/nettle/nettle.html#Copyright
> and spot checking files.
>
> Signed-off-by: Armin Kuster
On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 11:40 AM, akuster808 wrote:
>
> For me LGPLv2+ makes is all version above GPL2, but since I am not a lawyer
> it makes not sense on how to play that game. So I decided to drop pressuring
> the update.
We should represent what the license text says
" This program is free s
On 08/12/2015 07:14 AM, Jussi Kukkonen wrote:
Hi,
I realise I'm a bit late (with the commit in master already) but I'm
looking at upgrading this recipe and had some questions on this patch
and the recipe in general.
On 9 August 2015 at 08:28, Armin Kuster wrote:
adding the license definitio
Hi,
I realise I'm a bit late (with the commit in master already) but I'm
looking at upgrading this recipe and had some questions on this patch
and the recipe in general.
On 9 August 2015 at 08:28, Armin Kuster wrote:
> adding the license definitions on the few packages that
> deviate from the ov
adding the license definitions on the few packages that
deviate from the overall package license.
based on http://www.lysator.liu.se/~nisse/nettle/nettle.html#Copyright
and spot checking files.
Signed-off-by: Armin Kuster
---
meta/recipes-support/nettle/nettle_2.7.1.bb | 9 +
1 file cha
