On 19 January 2018 at 14:23, Oleg Kokorin wrote:
> hello Ross
>
> the whole patch supply procedure these days is completely messed-up IMHO.
>
> if I'm not sending to upstream, then why the damn patch being e-mailed? or
> perhaps
> just because I can't understand the difference in between "pending
On 19 January 2018 at 13:54, Oleg Kokorin wrote:
> +Upstream-Status: Pending
>
Is there a reason you're not sending this upstream?
Ross
--
___
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailm
On 19 January 2018 at 13:57, Oleg Kokorin wrote:
> I've got the points and re-sent the patch, but I'd like to add mine:
>
> by adding complexity instead of taking care of git and specifically
> send-email command providing necessary portions you'd like to have in patch
> in automated manner - you
hashtable_iterator_key and hashtable_iterator_value redefinition inside
mkfs.ubifs/hashtable/hashtable_itr.h cause linker redefinition error
Signed-off-by: Oleg Kokorin
---
.../mtd-utils-fix-hashtable_iterator.patch | 43 ++
meta/recipes-devtools/mtd/mtd-utils_git.bb
On 19 January 2018 at 13:17, Oleg Kokorin wrote:
> hello Ross
> why do I see this e-mail from you?
> "Signed-off-by: Oleg Kokorin " is in the patch.
>
The file mtd-utils-fix-hashtable_iterator.patch needs this information
too. See the wiki link I added (and the mail from patchtest that was also
On 19 January 2018 at 11:06, Oleg Kokorin wrote:
> diff --git
> a/meta/recipes-devtools/mtd/mtd-utils/mtd-utils-fix-hashtable_iterator.patch
> b/meta/recipes-devtools/mtd/mtd-utils/mtd-utils-fix-
> hashtable_iterator.patch
> new file mode 100644
> index 000..082f3b1
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/m
hashtable_iterator_key and hashtable_iterator_value redefinition inside
mkfs.ubifs/hashtable/hashtable_itr.h cause linker redefinition error
Signed-off-by: Oleg Kokorin
---
.../mtd-utils-fix-hashtable_iterator.patch | 31 ++
meta/recipes-devtools/mtd/mtd-utils_git.bb
