On Mon, 30 May 2016 14:26:30 Markus Lehtonen wrote:
> Hi Martin,
>
> On Fri, 2016-05-27 at 12:07 +0200, Martin Jansa wrote:
> > On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 09:26:10AM +0300, Markus Lehtonen wrote:
> > > The loop iterating over LICENSE_pn variables has never worked. In
> > > addition, the LICENSE varia
Hi Martin,
On Fri, 2016-05-27 at 12:07 +0200, Martin Jansa wrote:
> On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 09:26:10AM +0300, Markus Lehtonen wrote:
> > The loop iterating over LICENSE_pn variables has never worked. In
> > addition, the LICENSE variable is supposed to contain all licenses
> > defined in LICENSE_p
On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 09:26:10AM +0300, Markus Lehtonen wrote:
> The loop iterating over LICENSE_pn variables has never worked. In
> addition, the LICENSE variable is supposed to contain all licenses
> defined in LICENSE_pn variables.
Is this really true?
I've seen couple examples where LICENSE
The loop iterating over LICENSE_pn variables has never worked. In
addition, the LICENSE variable is supposed to contain all licenses
defined in LICENSE_pn variables. Thus, it is simpler just to use LICENSE
as the data we get is essentially the same.
[YOCTO #9499]
Signed-off-by: Markus Lehtonen
-
