On Mon, 2013-03-04 at 12:06 -0800, Khem Raj wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 3, 2013 at 9:04 AM, Richard Purdie
> wrote:
> > libgcc_s is not marked as executable and hence it doesn't get stripped. This
> > means its about 1MB larger than it needs to be. There is no good reason it
> > shouldn't get stripped so
On Sun, Mar 3, 2013 at 9:04 AM, Richard Purdie
wrote:
> libgcc_s is not marked as executable and hence it doesn't get stripped. This
> means its about 1MB larger than it needs to be. There is no good reason it
> shouldn't get stripped so ensure it does and mark as executable.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ri
libgcc_s is not marked as executable and hence it doesn't get stripped. This
means its about 1MB larger than it needs to be. There is no good reason it
shouldn't get stripped so ensure it does and mark as executable.
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie
---
diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/libgcc_
