Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] libc6: improve reproducibility

2018-01-13 Thread Bystricky, Juro
> Hi Juro, > > Can you put a comment alongside the touch in the recipe as we're not > going to know why we're doing this in a few years time... > Sure, no problem. I will send v2. BTW, this was fixed in upstream glibc, so the "touch" line can be removed once we upgrade glibc. I will put this i

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] libc6: improve reproducibility

2018-01-13 Thread Richard Purdie
On Fri, 2018-01-12 at 13:04 -0800, Juro Bystricky wrote: > Building various libraries (libc6, libc6-pic, libc6-staticdev, libc6- > dbg, ...) > can be non-deterministic because they may be built with two different > versions > of intl/plural.c. in two otherwise identical builds. We may or may > not

[OE-core] [PATCH] libc6: improve reproducibility

2018-01-12 Thread Juro Bystricky
Building various libraries (libc6, libc6-pic, libc6-staticdev, libc6-dbg, ...) can be non-deterministic because they may be built with two different versions of intl/plural.c. in two otherwise identical builds. We may or may not re-generate the file plural.c from the file plural.y, based on bison