On 07/18/2017 11:37 AM, Khem Raj wrote:
On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 12:21 PM, Martin Kelly wrote:
On 07/17/2017 07:47 PM, Khem Raj wrote:
On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 8:21 PM, Martin Kelly wrote:
Previously, we had a gst-python recipe, but it supported only GStreamer
0.1. After GStreamer switched t
On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 12:21 PM, Martin Kelly wrote:
> On 07/17/2017 07:47 PM, Khem Raj wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 8:21 PM, Martin Kelly wrote:
>>>
>>> Previously, we had a gst-python recipe, but it supported only GStreamer
>>> 0.1. After GStreamer switched the Python bindings to use G
On 07/17/2017 07:47 PM, Khem Raj wrote:
On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 8:21 PM, Martin Kelly wrote:
Previously, we had a gst-python recipe, but it supported only GStreamer
0.1. After GStreamer switched the Python bindings to use GObject
introspection, we were no longer able to build the bindings, and
On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 8:21 PM, Martin Kelly wrote:
> Previously, we had a gst-python recipe, but it supported only GStreamer
> 0.1. After GStreamer switched the Python bindings to use GObject
> introspection, we were no longer able to build the bindings, and they
> were dropped in this patch:
>
Previously, we had a gst-python recipe, but it supported only GStreamer
0.1. After GStreamer switched the Python bindings to use GObject
introspection, we were no longer able to build the bindings, and they
were dropped in this patch:
https://patchwork.openembedded.org/patch/93793/
However, at th
