Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] gcc: use ${base_lib} to match gcc default configuration

2011-08-11 Thread Kumar Gala
On Aug 11, 2011, at 1:41 PM, Richard Purdie wrote: > On Thu, 2011-08-11 at 16:30 +0100, Richard Purdie wrote: >> On Thu, 2011-08-11 at 01:47 -0500, Kumar Gala wrote: >>> revert this is not acceptable as that will break ppc64 builds. >>> >>> I think you need to look at 64bithack.patch and if we r

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] gcc: use ${base_lib} to match gcc default configuration

2011-08-11 Thread Richard Purdie
On Thu, 2011-08-11 at 16:30 +0100, Richard Purdie wrote: > On Thu, 2011-08-11 at 01:47 -0500, Kumar Gala wrote: > > revert this is not acceptable as that will break ppc64 builds. > > > > I think you need to look at 64bithack.patch and if we really should be > > using it for multilib builds. > >

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] gcc: use ${base_lib} to match gcc default configuration

2011-08-11 Thread Richard Purdie
On Thu, 2011-08-11 at 01:47 -0500, Kumar Gala wrote: > revert this is not acceptable as that will break ppc64 builds. > > I think you need to look at 64bithack.patch and if we really should be using > it for multilib builds. This just sounds like gcc totally ignores the the library directory we'

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] gcc: use ${base_lib} to match gcc default configuration

2011-08-11 Thread Khem Raj
On Thursday, August 11, 2011 03:45:01 PM Yu Ke wrote: > Ok, CC Richard to see if it is OK to not use 64bithack.patch > > Regards > Ke > > on 2011-8-11 14:47, Kumar Gala wrote: > > revert this is not acceptable as that will break ppc64 builds. > > > > I think you need to look at 64bithack.patch a

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] gcc: use ${base_lib} to match gcc default configuration

2011-08-11 Thread Yu Ke
Ok, CC Richard to see if it is OK to not use 64bithack.patch Regards Ke on 2011-8-11 14:47, Kumar Gala wrote: revert this is not acceptable as that will break ppc64 builds. I think you need to look at 64bithack.patch and if we really should be using it for multilib builds. - k On Aug 11, 20

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] gcc: use ${base_lib} to match gcc default configuration

2011-08-10 Thread Kumar Gala
revert this is not acceptable as that will break ppc64 builds. I think you need to look at 64bithack.patch and if we really should be using it for multilib builds. - k On Aug 11, 2011, at 1:36 AM, Yu Ke wrote: > Hi Kumar, > > I just found this patch breaks the qemux86-64 lib64 multilib build.

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] gcc: use ${base_lib} to match gcc default configuration

2011-08-10 Thread Yu Ke
Hi Kumar, I just found this patch breaks the qemux86-64 lib64 multilib build. the error log is as below: | mv: cannot stat `/home/kyu3/sdb/multilib2/tmp/work/x86_64-pokymllib64-linux/lib64-gcc-cross-intermediate-4.6.1+svnr175454-r4/image/home/kyu3/sdb/multilib2/tmp/sysroots/x86_64-linux/usr/x8

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] gcc: use ${base_lib} to match gcc default configuration

2011-08-05 Thread Saul Wold
On 08/05/2011 09:53 AM, Kumar Gala wrote: On Aug 4, 2011, at 1:54 PM, Kumar Gala wrote: Rather than tweaking MULTILIB_DIRNAMES& MULTILIB_OSDIRNAMES like is done for x86-64 via 64bithack.patch. We can just go with gcc defaults and utilize ${base_lib} for where to find gcc libs. Signed-off-by

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] gcc: use ${base_lib} to match gcc default configuration

2011-08-05 Thread Kumar Gala
On Aug 4, 2011, at 1:54 PM, Kumar Gala wrote: > Rather than tweaking MULTILIB_DIRNAMES & MULTILIB_OSDIRNAMES like is > done for x86-64 via 64bithack.patch. We can just go with gcc defaults > and utilize ${base_lib} for where to find gcc libs. > > Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala > --- > .../gcc/gcc-c

[OE-core] [PATCH] gcc: use ${base_lib} to match gcc default configuration

2011-08-04 Thread Kumar Gala
Rather than tweaking MULTILIB_DIRNAMES & MULTILIB_OSDIRNAMES like is done for x86-64 via 64bithack.patch. We can just go with gcc defaults and utilize ${base_lib} for where to find gcc libs. Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala --- .../gcc/gcc-cross-intermediate.inc |2 +- 1 files chan