On Sun, May 12, 2013 at 10:32 AM, Richard Purdie <
richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> On Fri, 2013-05-10 at 12:00 +0100, Burton, Ross wrote:
> > On 10 May 2013 11:50, Phil Blundell wrote:
> > > Or you could replace the shell wrapper that create_wrapper() currently
> > > generates with e
On Fri, 2013-05-10 at 12:00 +0100, Burton, Ross wrote:
> On 10 May 2013 11:50, Phil Blundell wrote:
> > Or you could replace the shell wrapper that create_wrapper() currently
> > generates with either a compiled binary or a Python script. That would
> > allow you to execl("/path/foo.real", "foo",
On 10 May 2013 11:50, Phil Blundell wrote:
> Or you could replace the shell wrapper that create_wrapper() currently
> generates with either a compiled binary or a Python script. That would
> allow you to execl("/path/foo.real", "foo", ...), which I don't think
> you can do in shell but which woul
On Fri, 2013-05-10 at 11:46 +0100, Phil Blundell wrote:
> On Fri, 2013-05-10 at 11:32 +0100, Richard Purdie wrote:
> > On Fri, 2013-05-10 at 12:20 +0200, Martin Jansa wrote:
> > > On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 01:15:10PM +0300, Bogdan Marinescu wrote:
> > > > Removed the patches to flex, because they are
On Fri, 2013-05-10 at 11:32 +0100, Richard Purdie wrote:
> On Fri, 2013-05-10 at 12:20 +0200, Martin Jansa wrote:
> > On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 01:15:10PM +0300, Bogdan Marinescu wrote:
> > > Removed the patches to flex, because they are now applied to the
> > > latest version.
> >
> > Can you check
On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 11:32:12AM +0100, Richard Purdie wrote:
> On Fri, 2013-05-10 at 12:20 +0200, Martin Jansa wrote:
> > On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 01:15:10PM +0300, Bogdan Marinescu wrote:
> > > Removed the patches to flex, because they are now applied to the
> > > latest version.
> >
> > Can yo
On Fri, 2013-05-10 at 12:20 +0200, Martin Jansa wrote:
> On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 01:15:10PM +0300, Bogdan Marinescu wrote:
> > Removed the patches to flex, because they are now applied to the
> > latest version.
>
> Can you check if 2.5.37 still reports flex.real when you call
> flex --version?
>
On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 01:15:10PM +0300, Bogdan Marinescu wrote:
> Removed the patches to flex, because they are now applied to the
> latest version.
Can you check if 2.5.37 still reports flex.real when you call
flex --version?
If yes, please integrate
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/pipermail/openem
On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 1:15 PM, Bogdan Marinescu <
bogdan.a.marine...@intel.com> wrote:
> Removed the patches to flex, because they are now applied to the
> latest version.
>
> Signed-off-by: Bogdan Marinescu
> ---
> .../flex/flex/avoid-FORTIFY-warnings.patch | 59
> --
Removed the patches to flex, because they are now applied to the
latest version.
Signed-off-by: Bogdan Marinescu
---
.../flex/flex/avoid-FORTIFY-warnings.patch | 59
.../flex/int-is-not-the-same-size-as-size_t.patch | 42 --
meta/recipes-devtools/fle
On Fri, 2013-02-01 at 12:29 +0200, Marinescu, Bogdan A wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 6:30 PM, Richard Purdie
> wrote:
> On Thu, 2013-01-31 at 13:53 +0200, Bogdan Marinescu wrote:
> > Removed the patches to flex, because they are now applied to
> the
> > latest ve
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 6:30 PM, Richard Purdie <
richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> On Thu, 2013-01-31 at 13:53 +0200, Bogdan Marinescu wrote:
> > Removed the patches to flex, because they are now applied to the
> > latest version.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Bogdan Marinescu
> > ---
> > .
On Thu, 2013-01-31 at 13:53 +0200, Bogdan Marinescu wrote:
> Removed the patches to flex, because they are now applied to the
> latest version.
>
> Signed-off-by: Bogdan Marinescu
> ---
> .../flex/flex/avoid-FORTIFY-warnings.patch | 59
>
> .../flex/int-is-not-the
Removed the patches to flex, because they are now applied to the
latest version.
Signed-off-by: Bogdan Marinescu
---
.../flex/flex/avoid-FORTIFY-warnings.patch | 59
.../flex/int-is-not-the-same-size-as-size_t.patch | 42 --
meta/recipes-devtools/fle
14 matches
Mail list logo