On Thu, 2011-06-02 at 13:15 +0100, Phil Blundell wrote:
> The glob for libc_baselibs was too permissive, causing some of the libcidn
> symlinks to be placed in ${PN} rather than the intended subpackage. Worse,
> the .so itself was actually landing in ${PN}-dev, so the net effect was to
> make libc
The glob for libc_baselibs was too permissive, causing some of the libcidn
symlinks to be placed in ${PN} rather than the intended subpackage. Worse,
the .so itself was actually landing in ${PN}-dev, so the net effect was to
make libc6-dev a dependency of libc6.
Bump PRs for both 2.12 and 2.13 as
