On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 1:47 AM, Richard Purdie
wrote:
> On Fri, 2013-11-08 at 10:33 +0100, Andrea Adami wrote:
>> On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 10:25 AM, Burton, Ross wrote:
>> > On 7 November 2013 23:18, Richard Purdie
>> > wrote:
>> >> +DISTRO ??= "nodistro"
>> >
>> > Wouldn't "oe-core" be a better n
On 11/8/13, 3:47 AM, Richard Purdie wrote:
On Fri, 2013-11-08 at 10:33 +0100, Andrea Adami wrote:
On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 10:25 AM, Burton, Ross wrote:
On 7 November 2013 23:18, Richard Purdie
wrote:
+DISTRO ??= "nodistro"
Wouldn't "oe-core" be a better name, considering that's what
DISTROV
On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 7:47 AM, Richard Purdie
wrote:
> On Fri, 2013-11-08 at 10:33 +0100, Andrea Adami wrote:
>> On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 10:25 AM, Burton, Ross wrote:
>> > On 7 November 2013 23:18, Richard Purdie
>> > wrote:
>> >> +DISTRO ??= "nodistro"
>> >
>> > Wouldn't "oe-core" be a better n
On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 9:23 AM, Martin Jansa wrote:
> I don't feel strongly about this, but I have heard people say "distroless"
> and I'm using the same when refering to default oe-core setup.
I like this idea.
--
Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems
http://www.ossystems.co
I don't feel strongly about this, but I have heard people say "distroless"
and I'm using the same when refering to default oe-core setup.
On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 10:47 AM, Richard Purdie <
richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> On Fri, 2013-11-08 at 10:33 +0100, Andrea Adami wrote:
> > On F
On Fri, 2013-11-08 at 10:33 +0100, Andrea Adami wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 10:25 AM, Burton, Ross wrote:
> > On 7 November 2013 23:18, Richard Purdie
> > wrote:
> >> +DISTRO ??= "nodistro"
> >
> > Wouldn't "oe-core" be a better name, considering that's what
> > DISTROVERSION becomes if DISTR
On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 10:25 AM, Burton, Ross wrote:
> On 7 November 2013 23:18, Richard Purdie
> wrote:
>> +DISTRO ??= "nodistro"
>
> Wouldn't "oe-core" be a better name, considering that's what
> DISTROVERSION becomes if DISTRO is unset?
>
> Ross
Agreed, we already have DISTRO_VERSION = "oe-c
On 7 November 2013 23:18, Richard Purdie
wrote:
> +DISTRO ??= "nodistro"
Wouldn't "oe-core" be a better name, considering that's what
DISTROVERSION becomes if DISTRO is unset?
Ross
___
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded
An empty distro value leads to OVERRIDES and FILESOVERRIDES containing
"::" entries which causes odd issues such as files being included when
they shouldn't be. We could put in anonymous python to guard against
empty entries but its messy and setting a default value for DISTRO to
something harmless
