W dniu 14.03.2013 21:24, Khem Raj pisze:
>>> No, we do not use /lib64/ for AArch64.
>
> Thats under discussion I have seen threads and patches on gcc ml and
> glibc ml about it.
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-03/msg00288.html
> http://sourceware.org/ml/libc-ports/2013-03/msg00125.ht
On Mar 14, 2013, at 11:18 AM, Marcin Juszkiewicz
wrote:
> W dniu 14.03.2013 19:04, Mark Hatle pisze:
>> I'm not completely familiar with aarch64. So a couple of questions.
>> The first is is it supposed to allow a multilib configuration? I.e.
>> being able to run both 32-bit "arm/thumb" code
On 3/14/13 1:18 PM, Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote:
W dniu 14.03.2013 19:04, Mark Hatle pisze:
I'm not completely familiar with aarch64. So a couple of questions.
The first is is it supposed to allow a multilib configuration? I.e.
being able to run both 32-bit "arm/thumb" code & aarch64 code on the
W dniu 14.03.2013 19:04, Mark Hatle pisze:
> I'm not completely familiar with aarch64. So a couple of questions.
> The first is is it supposed to allow a multilib configuration? I.e.
> being able to run both 32-bit "arm/thumb" code & aarch64 code on the
> same machine? If so, a "BASE_LIB_tune-a
On 3/14/13 12:41 PM, Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote:
Signed-off-by: Marcin Juszkiewicz
---
meta/conf/machine/include/aarch64/README | 9 +
meta/conf/machine/include/aarch64/arch-aarch64.inc | 16
2 files changed, 25 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 meta/conf/m
Signed-off-by: Marcin Juszkiewicz
---
meta/conf/machine/include/aarch64/README | 9 +
meta/conf/machine/include/aarch64/arch-aarch64.inc | 16
2 files changed, 25 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 meta/conf/machine/include/aarch64/README
create mode 100644 met
