On 13 November 2015 at 00:03, Rongqing Li wrote:
> Please edit the patch, instead of patching a patch.
>>
>
> I did not patching a patch, I create a new patch
>
Exactly. You're adding a patch that fixes a patch we created, please just
fix the broken code in the patch itself.
Ross
--
_
On 2015年11月12日 18:13, Burton, Ross wrote:
On 12 November 2015 at 03:04, mailto:rongqing...@windriver.com>> wrote:
+cache_inode.patch speeds up the making ext* filesystem, but it leads
+to the m_bigjournal ptest failure; In fact, when
ext2fs_extent_node_split
+is called, the ca
On 12 November 2015 at 03:04, wrote:
> +cache_inode.patch speeds up the making ext* filesystem, but it leads
> +to the m_bigjournal ptest failure; In fact, when ext2fs_extent_node_split
> +is called, the cache goal should be reset
> +
> +the patch fixes the m_bigjournal ptest failure, and does no
From: Roy Li
1. a hard-coded path in ptest is used, fix it.
2. fix the m_bigjournal ptest failure by resetting cache goal properly
3. fix the removal test.log error by adding the correct path before
test.log
Signed-off-by: Roy Li
---
.../e2fsprogs/e2fsprogs/0001-reset-last_goal.patch | 51
