Re: [OE-core] [PATCH][RFC] cortexa8: use hard floating point

2011-08-18 Thread Khem Raj
On 8/17/2011 11:16 PM, Darren Hart wrote: From what I could gather, it makes sense to address using mfloat-abi=hard for the beagleboard in the cortexa8 tune file. Before I submit this as a pull request, I'd appreciate a sanity check from the Beagleboard experts. Is there any reason the cortexa8

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH][RFC] cortexa8: use hard floating point

2011-08-18 Thread Jason Kridner
On Aug 18, 2011, at 3:11 AM, Koen Kooi wrote: > > Op 18 aug. 2011, om 08:16 heeft Darren Hart het volgende geschreven: > >> From what I could gather, it makes sense to address using mfloat-abi=hard >> for the beagleboard in the cortexa8 tune file. > > It doesn't, actually. Sadly the internet

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH][RFC] cortexa8: use hard floating point

2011-08-18 Thread Phil Blundell
On Wed, 2011-08-17 at 23:16 -0700, Darren Hart wrote: > From what I could gather, it makes sense to address using mfloat-abi=hard > for the beagleboard in the cortexa8 tune file. Before I submit this as a pull > request, I'd appreciate a sanity check from the Beagleboard experts. > >[...] > > mflo

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH][RFC] cortexa8: use hard floating point

2011-08-18 Thread Koen Kooi
Op 18 aug. 2011, om 08:16 heeft Darren Hart het volgende geschreven: > From what I could gather, it makes sense to address using mfloat-abi=hard > for the beagleboard in the cortexa8 tune file. It doesn't, actually. Sadly the internet is now full with posts from misinformed meego and debian peo

[OE-core] [PATCH][RFC] cortexa8: use hard floating point

2011-08-17 Thread Darren Hart
>From what I could gather, it makes sense to address using mfloat-abi=hard for the beagleboard in the cortexa8 tune file. Before I submit this as a pull request, I'd appreciate a sanity check from the Beagleboard experts. Is there any reason the cortexa8 tune file should not be using "hf" by defau