On 8/17/2011 11:16 PM, Darren Hart wrote:
From what I could gather, it makes sense to address using mfloat-abi=hard
for the beagleboard in the cortexa8 tune file. Before I submit this as a pull
request, I'd appreciate a sanity check from the Beagleboard experts.
Is there any reason the cortexa8
On Aug 18, 2011, at 3:11 AM, Koen Kooi wrote:
>
> Op 18 aug. 2011, om 08:16 heeft Darren Hart het volgende geschreven:
>
>> From what I could gather, it makes sense to address using mfloat-abi=hard
>> for the beagleboard in the cortexa8 tune file.
>
> It doesn't, actually. Sadly the internet
On Wed, 2011-08-17 at 23:16 -0700, Darren Hart wrote:
> From what I could gather, it makes sense to address using mfloat-abi=hard
> for the beagleboard in the cortexa8 tune file. Before I submit this as a pull
> request, I'd appreciate a sanity check from the Beagleboard experts.
>
>[...]
>
> mflo
Op 18 aug. 2011, om 08:16 heeft Darren Hart het volgende geschreven:
> From what I could gather, it makes sense to address using mfloat-abi=hard
> for the beagleboard in the cortexa8 tune file.
It doesn't, actually. Sadly the internet is now full with posts from
misinformed meego and debian peo
>From what I could gather, it makes sense to address using mfloat-abi=hard
for the beagleboard in the cortexa8 tune file. Before I submit this as a pull
request, I'd appreciate a sanity check from the Beagleboard experts.
Is there any reason the cortexa8 tune file should not be using "hf" by defau