On 10 March 2015 at 14:42, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
wrote:
> On March 9, 2015 9:11:29 AM GMT+01:00, Naresh Bhat
> wrote:
>
> >today/tomorrow. Can we please continue the discussion on my next
> >series. Probably you can give me few more points on my next patch
> >series.
>
> Please CC me so i d
On March 9, 2015 9:11:29 AM GMT+01:00, Naresh Bhat
wrote:
>today/tomorrow. Can we please continue the discussion on my next
>series. Probably you can give me few more points on my next patch
>series.
Please CC me so i do not overlook the new series, TIA.
--
_
Hi Bernhard Reutner-Fischer,
On 5 March 2015 at 21:48, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
wrote:
> On 5 March 2015 at 15:06, Naresh Bhat wrote:
>
if d.getVar('TARGET_ARCH', True) == "aarch64":
return
Does it make sense ?
>>>
>>> At least the parser should grok it.
>>> The c
On 5 March 2015 at 15:06, Naresh Bhat wrote:
>>>if d.getVar('TARGET_ARCH', True) == "aarch64":
>>> return
>>>
>>>Does it make sense ?
>>
>> At least the parser should grok it.
>> The change itself does not make sense to me either way.
> I did this change because it does not make any
On 4 March 2015 at 12:56, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
wrote:
> On March 4, 2015 8:15:15 AM GMT+01:00, Naresh Bhat
> wrote:
>>On 3 March 2015 at 23:27, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
>> wrote:
>>> On 3 March 2015 at 16:46, Naresh Bhat wrote:
Build iso image required syslinux package. We have alread
On 5 March 2015 at 02:07, Burton, Ross wrote:
> Hi Naresh,
>
> On 3 March 2015 at 15:46, Naresh Bhat wrote:
>>
>> +if [ "${TARGET_ARCH}" == "aarch64" ]:
>> + return
>> +else:
>> +bb.build.exec_func('build_iso', d)
>
>
> As Bernhard says, that isn't valid Python. W
Hi Naresh,
On 3 March 2015 at 15:46, Naresh Bhat wrote:
> +if [ "${TARGET_ARCH}" == "aarch64" ]:
> + return
> +else:
> +bb.build.exec_func('build_iso', d)
>
As Bernhard says, that isn't valid Python. Were these patches actually
tested?
Ross
--
On March 4, 2015 8:15:15 AM GMT+01:00, Naresh Bhat
wrote:
>On 3 March 2015 at 23:27, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
> wrote:
>> On 3 March 2015 at 16:46, Naresh Bhat wrote:
>>> Build iso image required syslinux package. We have already skip the
>syslinux
>>> package. Hence just skip the iso image bu
On 3 March 2015 at 23:27, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
wrote:
> On 3 March 2015 at 16:46, Naresh Bhat wrote:
>> Build iso image required syslinux package. We have already skip the syslinux
>> package. Hence just skip the iso image build too.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Naresh Bhat
>> Reviewed-by: Matt Fl
On 3 March 2015 at 16:46, Naresh Bhat wrote:
> Build iso image required syslinux package. We have already skip the syslinux
> package. Hence just skip the iso image build too.
>
> Signed-off-by: Naresh Bhat
> Reviewed-by: Matt Fleming
> ---
> meta/classes/bootimg.bbclass |6 +-
> 1 fi
Build iso image required syslinux package. We have already skip the syslinux
package. Hence just skip the iso image build too.
Signed-off-by: Naresh Bhat
Reviewed-by: Matt Fleming
---
meta/classes/bootimg.bbclass |6 +-
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/meta
11 matches
Mail list logo
