Re: [OE-core] [CONSOLIDATED PULL 00/40] Review and ACK

2013-07-18 Thread Saul Wold
On 07/18/2013 02:43 AM, Paul Eggleton wrote: On Wednesday 17 July 2013 23:34:31 Saul Wold wrote: Ross, Paul: Please review this set and ACK as appropriate, I will rebase based on your input. This this is on the AB down, we have known issues with systemd. This addresses many of the M2 related i

Re: [OE-core] [CONSOLIDATED PULL 00/40] Review and ACK

2013-07-18 Thread Phil Blundell
On Thu, 2013-07-18 at 13:16 +0100, Paul Eggleton wrote: > On Thursday 18 July 2013 12:35:04 Burton, Ross wrote: > > On 18 July 2013 12:15, Phil Blundell wrote: > > > Seeing this discussion makes me wonder: if the target perl hasn't > > > actually been built at this point, how does rpmdeps know wha

Re: [OE-core] [CONSOLIDATED PULL 00/40] Review and ACK

2013-07-18 Thread Paul Eggleton
On Thursday 18 July 2013 12:35:04 Burton, Ross wrote: > On 18 July 2013 12:15, Phil Blundell wrote: > > Seeing this discussion makes me wonder: if the target perl hasn't > > actually been built at this point, how does rpmdeps know what package to > > add a dependency on in the first place? Does i

Re: [OE-core] [CONSOLIDATED PULL 00/40] Review and ACK

2013-07-18 Thread Otavio Salvador
On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 6:43 AM, Paul Eggleton wrote: > On Wednesday 17 July 2013 23:34:31 Saul Wold wrote: .. >> Roy.Li (1): >> dpkg: backport a patch to support mipsn32el and mips64el > > Not sure if case is a big issue for Upstream-Status values but this one has > "Upstream-Status: BackPort".

Re: [OE-core] [CONSOLIDATED PULL 00/40] Review and ACK

2013-07-18 Thread Burton, Ross
On 18 July 2013 12:15, Phil Blundell wrote: > Seeing this discussion makes me wonder: if the target perl hasn't > actually been built at this point, how does rpmdeps know what package to > add a dependency on in the first place? Does it just have some random > hard-coded list somewhere? It adds

Re: [OE-core] [CONSOLIDATED PULL 00/40] Review and ACK

2013-07-18 Thread Phil Blundell
On Thu, 2013-07-18 at 12:01 +0100, Paul Eggleton wrote: > On Thursday 18 July 2013 11:52:22 Burton, Ross wrote: > > On 18 July 2013 07:34, Saul Wold wrote: > > > valgrind: added perl dependency > > > > I presume the situation here is that a target perl wasn't actually > > built, so adding an ex

Re: [OE-core] [CONSOLIDATED PULL 00/40] Review and ACK

2013-07-18 Thread Paul Eggleton
On Thursday 18 July 2013 11:52:22 Burton, Ross wrote: > On 18 July 2013 07:34, Saul Wold wrote: > > valgrind: added perl dependency > > I presume the situation here is that a target perl wasn't actually > built, so adding an explicit runtime dependency causes it to be built > and therefore avai

Re: [OE-core] [CONSOLIDATED PULL 00/40] Review and ACK

2013-07-18 Thread Burton, Ross
Hi, What Paul said, I can't see any other issues. On 18 July 2013 07:34, Saul Wold wrote: > valgrind: added perl dependency I presume the situation here is that a target perl wasn't actually built, so adding an explicit runtime dependency causes it to be built and therefore available in the f

Re: [OE-core] [CONSOLIDATED PULL 00/40] Review and ACK

2013-07-18 Thread Paul Eggleton
On Wednesday 17 July 2013 23:34:31 Saul Wold wrote: > Ross, Paul: > > Please review this set and ACK as appropriate, I will rebase based > on your input. This this is on the AB down, we have known issues with > systemd. This addresses many of the M2 related issues and fixes the > testimage infras

[OE-core] [CONSOLIDATED PULL 00/40] Review and ACK

2013-07-17 Thread Saul Wold
Ross, Paul: Please review this set and ACK as appropriate, I will rebase based on your input. This this is on the AB down, we have known issues with systemd. This addresses many of the M2 related issues and fixes the testimage infrasturcture on teh AutoBuilder Please look at Qi's "EXTRA_USER"