On Tue, 2020-12-22 at 15:09 +, Paul Barker wrote:
> On Tue, 22 Dec 2020 at 14:57, Erik Botö wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Dec 22, 2020 at 2:50 PM Paul Barker
> > wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > Looking at that bug (#14129) I wonder why "${WORKDIR}/build-wic"
> > > was
> > > added to PSEUDO_IGNORE_PATHS
On Tue, 22 Dec 2020 at 14:57, Erik Botö wrote:
>
> On Tue, Dec 22, 2020 at 2:50 PM Paul Barker wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 22 Dec 2020 at 10:03, Richard Purdie
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, 2020-12-22 at 10:08 +0100, Erik Boto wrote:
> > > > There's a bug affecting wic in combination with --exclude-
On Tue, Dec 22, 2020 at 2:50 PM Paul Barker wrote:
>
> On Tue, 22 Dec 2020 at 10:03, Richard Purdie
> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 2020-12-22 at 10:08 +0100, Erik Boto wrote:
> > > There's a bug affecting wic in combination with --exclude-path /
> > > --include-path that would then be backported into t
On Tue, 22 Dec 2020 at 10:03, Richard Purdie
wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2020-12-22 at 10:08 +0100, Erik Boto wrote:
> > There's a bug affecting wic in combination with --exclude-path /
> > --include-path that would then be backported into the LTS version.
> > See
> > https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show
On Tue, 2020-12-22 at 10:08 +0100, Erik Boto wrote:
> There's a bug affecting wic in combination with --exclude-path /
> --include-path that would then be backported into the LTS version.
> See
> https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14129.
>
> Maybe the issue that is being fixed is mo
There's a bug affecting wic in combination with --exclude-path /
--include-path that would then be backported into the LTS version. See
https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14129.
Maybe the issue that is being fixed is more serious then the issue
being introduced so it's a valid trade
On Mon, Dec 21, 2020 at 4:33 AM Martin Jansa wrote:
>
> Just curious, is this PR on hold or rejected completely?
>
> I don't have strong opinion either way, I was just wondering about this one
> when other newer PRs were already merged.
This series is still actively being tested. I've been waiti
Just curious, is this PR on hold or rejected completely?
I don't have strong opinion either way, I was just wondering about this one
when other newer PRs were already merged.
On Thu, Dec 3, 2020 at 4:08 PM Steve Sakoman wrote:
> Issues with undetected file mode corruption in pseudo have been id
Issues with undetected file mode corruption in pseudo have been identified.
Fixes have been merged into master and gatesgarth over the past couple of
months and
things seem to have stabilized enough that we can consider backporting these
fixes
to dunfell.
This is a somewhat more invasive change
