I don't have a strong opinion here. Petr wanted to trim dependencies
down to bare minimum, but if we need to strike a more reasonable
balance, that's fine.
Alex
On Mon, 15 May 2023 at 18:43, Ross Burton wrote:
>
>
>
> > On 15 May 2023, at 15:49, Petr Kubizňák - 2N wrote:
> > The key question is
> On 15 May 2023, at 15:49, Petr Kubizňák - 2N wrote:
> The key question is whether the problematic packages have intrinsic
> dependency on g-i-native, which can (and should) be fixed by adding the
> package in DEPENDS directly, or g-i-native is always needed as Ross says,
> which would imply
> On 15 May 2023, at 14:58, Ross Burton via lists.openembedded.org
> wrote:
> g-i-native will *always* be needed as a build dependency, because packages
> built from git may not have any m4 macros in.
I have a patch, just giving it a soak test.
Ross
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive
ative should be always in DEPENDS.
Petr
From: Ross Burton
Sent: Monday, May 15, 2023 3:58 PM
To: martin.ja...@gmail.com
Cc: Petr Kubizňák - 2N; openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
Subject: Re: [OE-core][PATCH v5 1/6] gobject-introspection: reduce dependen
On 15 May 2023, at 12:40, Martin Jansa via lists.openembedded.org
wrote:
> do_configure:prepend:class-target () {
> -# introspection.m4 pre-packaged with upstream tarballs does not yet
> -# have our fixes
> -mkdir -p ${S}/m4
> -cp ${STAGING_DIR_TARGET}/${datadir}/aclocal/introspe
On Mon, Apr 3, 2023 at 1:08 PM Petr Kubizňák wrote:
> When GI_DATA_ENABLED is 'False' (e.g. because
> 'gobject-introspection-data' is not in DISTRO_FEATURES),
> gobject-introspection, gobject-introspection-native and qemu-native
> should not be added to DEPENDS. This is to reduce dependency chain
When GI_DATA_ENABLED is 'False' (e.g. because
'gobject-introspection-data' is not in DISTRO_FEATURES),
gobject-introspection, gobject-introspection-native and qemu-native
should not be added to DEPENDS. This is to reduce dependency chain
when g-i is disabled.
Signed-off-by: Petr Kubizňák
---
met
