Yes it's non-trivial, but would be very appreciated. On the other hand,
backporting these fixes (which are not about security, and can be applied
in your private layer via bbappend) removes all incentive for you to work
on the upgrade and it becomes someone else's problem.
Alex
On Tue, 18 May 20
It would be nice, but it was non-trivial so I opted to go this path
first. These patches can be dropped once v248.2 is brought in.
On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 2:26 AM Alexander Kanavin
wrote:
>
> At this point it might be better to update systemd itself to 248?
>
> Alex
>
> On Tue, 18 May 2021 at 00:
At this point it might be better to update systemd itself to 248?
Alex
On Tue, 18 May 2021 at 00:51, William A. Kennington III via
lists.openembedded.org wrote:
> Backport a patch to fix the creation of static neighbors.
>
> Signed-off-by: William A. Kennington III
> ---
> ...or-Always-add-ne
Backport a patch to fix the creation of static neighbors.
Signed-off-by: William A. Kennington III
---
...or-Always-add-neighbors-with-replace.patch | 50 +++
meta/recipes-core/systemd/systemd_247.6.bb| 1 +
2 files changed, 51 insertions(+)
create mode 100644
meta/recipes
